Filter

Open

25

AUG

2022

业界新闻:

第二十三届中国专利奖获奖名单出炉

List of Winners of the 23rd China Patent Award Was Announced

近日,由中国国家知识产权局和世界知识产权组织共同开展的第二十三届中国专利奖获奖名单出炉,958件专利分获中国专利奖金、银、优秀奖和中国外观设计金、银、优秀奖,28家单位获中国专利奖最佳、优秀组织奖,18位院士获中国专利奖最佳推荐奖。

Recently, the list of winners of the 23rd China Patent Award jointly recognized by the CNIPA and the WIPO was released. Altogether, 958 patents won the gold, silver and excellent award of the China Patent Award, and the gold, silver and excellent award for China Design Award. 28 organizations won the best and excellent organization award of the China Patent Award, and 18 academicians won the best recommendation award of the China Patent Award.

据悉,此届中国专利奖评选中,丁苯酞环糊精或环糊精衍生物包合物及其制备方法和用途30件发明、实用新型专利获中国专利金奖,伽马刀10件外观设计专利获中国外观设计金奖。一种治疗小儿食积咳嗽的中药组合物及其制备方法60件发明、实用新型专利获中国专利银奖,中子活化多元素分析仪15件外观设计专利获中国外观设计银奖;有效部位药物沉积得到改善的干粉组合物791件发明、实用新型专利获中国专利优秀奖,“LED庭院灯(中式)52件外观设计专利获中国外观设计优秀奖。此外,中国国家知识产权局决定授予江苏省知识产权局等8家单位中国专利奖最佳组织奖,中国科学院科技促进发展局等20家单位中国专利奖优秀组织奖,舒兴田等18位院士中国专利奖最佳推荐奖。

It is reported that in the current China Patent Award selection, 30 invention and utility model patents including "Butylbenzene phthalein cyclodextrin or cyclodextrin derivative clathrate, its preparation method and application" won the China patent gold award, and 10 design patents including "gamma knife" won the China design gold award. 60 invention and utility model patents including "Traditional Chinese medicine composition for treating infantile cough and preparation method thereof" won the Chinese patent silver award, and 15 design patents such as "Neutron Activation Multi-Element Analyzer" won the Chinese design silver award. 791 invention and utility model patents including "Dry powder composition for improvement of effective position medical deposit" won the Chinese patent excellence award, and 52 design patents such as "LED courtyard lamp (Chinese style)" won the Chinese design excellence award. In addition, the CNIPA has decided to award the best organization award of the China Patent Award to 8 units including the Intellectual Property Office of Jiangsu Province, the excellent organization award of the China Patent Award to 20 organizations including the Bureau of Science & Technology for Development Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the best recommendation award of the China Patent Award to 18 academicians including SHU Xingtian.

附:国家知识产权局关于第二十三届中国专利奖授奖的决定

Attachment: Decision of the CNIPA on awarding the 23rd China Patent Award

(来源:中国知识产权报)

(Source: China Intellectual Property News)

首届世界知识产权组织全球奖揭晓,中国获奖企业数量居首

The 1st WIPO Global Award Was Announced, and China Led the Way in the Number of Award-Winning Enterprises

世界知识产权组织(WIPO)官网消息,719日,首届WIPO全球奖颁奖仪式在WIPO成员国大会期间举行。5家企业从62个国家的272家申报企业中脱颖而出,捧得奖杯。获奖企业按字母排序分别为:Hydraloop(荷兰)、Lucence(新加坡)、瑞派宁(中国)、芯龙光电(中国)和Splink(日本)。从获奖企业数量上看,中国独占两席,成为首届WIPO全球奖获奖企业最多的国家。

According to the official website of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), on July 19, the 1st WIPO Global Award ceremony was held during the general assembly of WIPO member states. 5 enterprises emerged from 272 participating enterprises in 62 countries and won the trophy. In alphabetical order, the winning enterprises are Hydraloop (Netherlands), Lucence (Singapore), Raycan (China), Shylon Optoelectronics (China) and Splink (Japan). In terms of the number of award-winning enterprises, China took two seats and became the country with the largest number of award-winning enterprises in the 1st WIPO Global Award.

(来源:中国国家知识产权局政务微信)

(Source: Official Wechat of the CNIPA)

2021年中国专利调查报告》发布

2021 China Patent Investigation Report Was Released

近日,中国国家知识产权局发布《2021年中国专利调查报告》。调查数据显示,现阶段,中国专利转移转化状况保持活跃,有效发明专利产业化率持续提升,产学研合作创新成效显著,国内知识产权保护环境稳中向好。

Recently, the CNIPA released the 2021 China Patent Investigation Report. The survey data shows that at this stage, China's patent transfer and transformation remain active, the industrialization rate of effective invention patents continues to increase, the industry-university-research cooperation and innovation have achieved remarkable results, and the domestic intellectual property protection environment progresses while maintaining stability.

一是中国有效发明专利产业化率稳中有升。2021年,中国发明专利产业化率为35.4%,较上年提高0.7个百分点,近3年来呈上升态势,近5年稳定在3成以上。作为创新的主体,企业的有效发明专利产业化率达到46.8%,较上年提高1.9个百分点。从企业规模看,大、中、小型企业发明专利产业化率分别达到47.1%54.6%47.7%,均较上年有所提升。

First, the industrialization rate of China's effective invention patents has steadily increased. In 2021, the industrialization rate of China's invention patents was 35.4%, an increase of 0.7 percentage points over the previous year, showing an upward trend in the past three years and stable at more than 30% in the past five years. As the main body of innovation, the industrialization rate of effective invention patents of enterprises reached 46.8%, an increase of 1.9 percentage points over the previous year. From the perspective of enterprise scale, the industrialization rate of invention patents of large, medium and small enterprises reached 47.1%, 54.6% and 47.7% respectively, all of which increased over the previous year.

二是产学研合作有效带动专利产业化水平提升。调查显示,产学研发明专利中,以高校为第一专利权人的产业化率达到22.8%,是高校平均水平的七倍以上;以科研机构为第一专利权人的产学研发明专利产业化率为25.8%,高于科研机构平均水平约10个百分点。数据还显示,产学研合作发明专利的产业化平均收益超过企业平均水平32.5%,产学研合作提升经济效益作用明显。

Second, industry-university-research cooperation effectively promoted the level of patent industrialization. According to the survey, the industrialization rate of universities as the first patentee in the industry-university-research invention patents reached 22.8%, more than seven times the average level of universities. The industrialization rate of industry-university-research invention patents with scientific research institutions as the first patentee was 25.8%, about 10 percentage points higher than the average level of scientific research institutions. The data also shows that the average industrialization income of the invention patents of industry-university-research cooperation exceeds the average level of enterprises by 32.5%, and the industry-university-research cooperation has an obvious effect on improving economic benefits.

三是中国知识产权保护环境整体向好。2021年,中国企业遭遇专利侵权后采取维权措施的比例为76.4%,较上年提高2.5个百分点,企业专利权人应对专利侵权更加主动。中国专利侵权诉讼案件的法院判定赔偿、诉讼调解或庭审和解金额在100万元以上的比例为16.3%,较上年高出9.0个百分点。

Third, China's intellectual property protection environment is improving overall. In 2021, 76.4% of Chinese enterprises took measures to protect their rights after encountering patent infringement, an increase of 2.5 percentage points over the previous year. Enterprise patentees were more proactive in responding to patent infringement. In China's patent infringement lawsuits, 16.3% of the cases were determined by the court for compensation, litigation mediation or court settlement with an amount of more than 1 million yuan, 9.0 percentage points higher than the previous year.

(来源:中国国家知识产权局政务微信)

(Source: Official Wechat of the CNIPA)

典型案例:

双飞人制药股份有限公司与广州赖特斯商务咨询有限公司等侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷案

Case of disputes over trademark infringement and unfair competition between Double Rider Medicine Co., Ltd. and Guangzhou Laites Business Consulting Co., Ltd.

案情摘要:

Case summary:

双飞人制药股份有限公司(以下简称双飞人公司)是双飞人注册商标权利人,该商标核定使用商品为第3类的花露水、化妆品等。同时,双飞人公司还是两个核定使用在爽水产品上的双飞人立体商标的权利人。法国利佳制药厂拥有指定使用在第3类商品上的利佳注册商标,广州赖特斯商务咨询有限公司(以下简称赖特斯公司)独家代理在中国境内宣传、推广、分销和销售利佳薄荷水等利佳品牌化妆品。双飞人公司以赖特斯公司等生产、销售利佳薄荷水侵害其注册商标专用权,并同时实施了不正当竞争行为为由,向法院提起诉讼。一审法院认为,利佳薄荷水与双飞人商标核定使用的双飞人爽水属于相同商品。经对比,被诉侵权产品包装与双飞人公司的立体商标构成近似并可能导致相关公众混淆误认,赖特斯公司侵害了双飞人公司的立体商标专用权。同时,赖特斯公司为实现商业目的,在产品宣传中强调其产品为双飞人产品(双飞人药水),构成对双飞人文字商标的侵权。此外,利佳薄荷水的包装装潢与双飞人公司知名商品的包装装潢近似,赖特斯公司的行为构成不正当竞争。赖斯特公司等不服提起上诉,二审法院判决驳回上诉、维持原判。赖特斯公司向最高人民法院申请再审。最高人民法院再审认为,赖特斯公司提交的证据可以证明,法国利佳制药厂自上世纪90年代起在中国大陆部分地区的报纸上刊登双飞人药水广告,持续时间较长、发行地域和发行量较大,可证明法国利佳制药厂在先使用的双飞人药水所采用的蓝、白、红包装有一定影响。双飞人公司明知双飞人药水存在于市场,却恶意申请注册与双飞人药水包装近似的立体商标并行使权利,其行为难言正当,赖特斯公司的在先使用抗辩成立。双飞人公司关于赖特斯公司构成侵害注册商标专用权及不正当竞争的主张均不能成立。最高人民法院遂判决撤销一审、二审判决,驳回双飞人公司的诉讼请求。

Double Rider Medicine Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Double Rider company) is the right holder of the registered trademark "双飞人". The trademark is approved for use on goods in Class 3 including toilet water, cosmetics, etc. Meanwhile, Double Rider company is also the right holder of the two three-dimensional trademarks "双飞人" approved for use in peppermint aqua products. Haribo Ricqles Zan has the registered trademark "Lijia" designated for use on goods in Class 3. Guangzhou Laites Business Consulting Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Laites company) is the sole agent to advertise, promote, distribute and sell Lijia peppermint cure and other "Lijia" brand cosmetics in China. Double Rider company filed a lawsuit with the court on the ground that the production and sales of Lijia peppermint cure by Laites company infringed on the exclusive right of its registered trademark and at the same time Laites company carried out unfair competition. The court of first instance held that Lijia peppermint cure and "peppermint aqua" approved for use by the "双飞人" trademark belong to the same commodity. Through comparison, the packaging of the sued infringing product is similar to the three-dimensional trademark of Double Rider company and may cause confusion and misunderstanding among the relevant public. Laites company infringed the exclusive right of the three-dimensional trademark of Double Rider company. At the same time, in order to achieve commercial purposes, Laites company emphasized in the product publicity that its products are "双飞人" products (RICQLES peppermint cure), which constitutes an infringement of the word trademark "双飞人". In addition, the packaging and decoration of Lijia peppermint cure is similar to the packaging and decoration of well-known products of Double Rider company, and the act of Laites company constitutes unfair competition. Laites company refused to accept and filed an appeal. The second instance court rejected the appeal and upheld the original judgment. Laites company applied to the Supreme People's Court for retrial. The Supreme People's court held in the retrial that the evidence submitted by Laites company can prove that Haribo Ricqles Zan published the advertisement of "RICQLES peppermint cure" in newspapers in some areas of Chinese Mainland since the 1990s, which lasted for a long time and has a large distribution area and circulation volume, which can prove that the "blue, white and red" packaging used by Haribo Ricqles Zan for the priorly used "RICQLES peppermint cure" has a certain impact. Double Rider company knew that "RICQLES peppermint cure" existed in the market, but maliciously applied for registration of a three-dimensional trademark similar to the packaging of "RICQLES peppermint cure" and exercised its rights. It is hard to say that its act is justified, and the defense for prior use of Laites company is established. Double Rider company's claim that Laites company constitutes infringement of the exclusive right of registered trademark and unfair competition cannot be established. The Supreme People's Court therefore made a judgment to cancel the judgments of the first and second instance, and rejected the claims of Double Rider company.

典型意义:

Typical significance:

本案涉及商标先用权抗辩的审查问题。先用权抗辩制度的目的,是保护善意的在先使用者在原有范围内继续使用其有一定影响的商业标识的利益,是诚实信用原则在商标法领域的重要体现。再审判决有效保护了诚信经营带来的使用权益,是人民法院加强知识产权诉讼诚信体系建设的有益探索。

The case involves the examination of the defense of prior use right of the trademark. The prior use right defense system aims to protect the interests of bona fide prior users to continue to use their influential business marks within the original scope, and is an important embodiment of the principle of good faith in the field of trademark law. The retrial judgment effectively protects the use rights and interests brought by the honest operation, and is a beneficial exploration for the people's court to strengthen the construction of the honest system of intellectual property litigation.

(案件来源:中华人民共和国最高人民法院)

(Source of case: Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China)

嘉兴市中华化工有限责任公司、上海欣晨新技术有限公司与王龙集团有限公司等侵害技术秘密纠纷案

Case of Dispute of Jiaxing Zhonghua Chemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai Xinchen New Technology Co., Ltd. against Wanglong Group Co., Ltd. over Infringement of Technical Secrets

案情摘要:

Case brief:

嘉兴市中华化工有限责任公司(以下简称嘉兴中华化工公司)、上海欣晨新技术有限公司拥有使用乙醛酸法制备香兰素工艺的技术秘密。嘉兴中华化工公司基于该工艺一跃成为全球最大的香兰素制造商,占全球市场约60%的份额。王龙集团有限公司(以下简称王龙集团公司)及其法定代表人等通过嘉兴中华化工公司香兰素车间副主任非法获取了该技术秘密,并使用该技术秘密工艺大规模生产香兰素产品,导致香兰素产品价格下滑、嘉兴中华化工公司的市场份额缩减。嘉兴中华化工公司等遂诉至法院。一审法院认定王龙集团公司等构成侵害部分技术秘密,判决其停止侵害、赔偿经济损失350万元,同时作出行为保全裁定,责令立即停止侵害涉案技术秘密。一审判决后,王龙集团公司继续实施侵权行为。双方当事人提起上诉。最高人民法院二审认为,王龙集团公司系其法定代表人为侵权而设立的企业,且其法定代表人积极参与侵权行为的实施,故王龙集团公司与其法定代表人构成共同侵害全部技术秘密,应当承担连带赔偿责任。根据权利人提供的经济损失数据,综合考虑涉案技术秘密商业价值大、侵权情节恶劣、被告拒不执行人民法院行为保全裁定等因素,改判王龙集团公司及其法定代表人等连带赔偿1.59亿元。

Jiaxing Zhonghua Chemical Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jiaxing Zhonghua Chemical company) and Shanghai Xinchen New Technology Co., Ltd. have the technical secrets of using glyoxylic acid method to prepare vanillin. Based on this process, Jiaxing Zhonghua Chemical company has become the largest vanillin manufacturer in the world, accounting for about 60% of the global market. Wanglong Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Wanglong Group) and its legal representative illegally obtained the technical secret through the deputy director of vanillin workshop of Jiaxing Zhonghua Chemical company, and used the technical secret process to produce vanillin products on a large scale, resulting in the decline of vanillin product price and the reduction of market share of Jiaxing Zhonghua Chemical company. Jiaxing Zhonghua Chemical company filed a lawsuit to the court. The court of first instance determined that Wanglong Group constituted infringement of partial technical secrets, and ordered it to stop the infringement and compensate the economic loss of 3.5 million yuan. At the same time, the court made a ruling on action preservation and ordered to immediately stop the infringement of the technical secrets involved. After the judgment of the first instance, Wanglong Group continued to carry out the infringement. Both parties filed an appeal. As deemed in the second instance of the Supreme People's Court, Wanglong Group was established by its legal representative for infringement, and its legal representative actively participated in the implementation of the infringement. Therefore, Wanglong Group and its legal representative constituted joint infringement of all technical secrets and should bear the joint and several liability. According to the economic loss data provided by the right holder, and taking into account the factors such as the high commercial value of the technical secrets involved, the bad infringement circumstances, and the defendant's refusal to execute the people's court's action preservation ruling, the judgment was changed to the joint and several compensation of 159 million yuan for Wanglong Group and its legal representative.

典型意义:

Typical significance:

该案是人民法院历史上生效判决确定赔偿数额最高的侵害商业秘密案件。该案裁判提高了侵权违法成本,切实保护了重要产业核心技术,对于在侵害技术秘密案件中认定损害赔偿具有参考意义。

This case is the case of infringing trade secrets with the highest amount of compensation determined by the effective judgment of the people's court in history. The judgment of this case raises the cost of infringement and effectively protects the core technology of important industries, which is of reference significance for the determination of damages in the case of infringement of technical secrets.

(案件来源:中华人民共和国最高人民法院)

(Source of case: Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China)

施耐德侵害商标权纠纷案

Case of Dispute over "Schneider" Infringing Trademark Right

基本案情:

Case Brief:

施耐德电气(中国)有限公司(简称施耐德中国公司)经授权在第9电开关、断路器、继电器等商品上享有第G715396号等五枚“Schneider”“施耐德中外文商标的使用权,并有权提起民事诉讼。20131月,施耐德中国公司向杭州市下城区人民法院提起诉讼,主张杭州东恒电器有限公司(简称东恒公司)的前身杭州施耐德电器有限公司侵害第G715396号商标权。经法院调解确认,东恒公司应停止侵害第G715396号商标权、变更企业名称并赔偿施耐德中国公司经济损失和合理开支共计10万元。

Schneider Electric (China) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Schneider China company) is authorized to enjoy the right to use five Chinese and foreign trademarks of "Schneider" and "施耐德" such as No. G715396 on goods in Class 9 including "electric switches, circuit breakers and electric relays", and has the right to file civil lawsuits. In January 2013, Schneider China company filed a lawsuit with the people's court of Xiacheng District, Hangzhou, claiming that "Hangzhou Schneider Electric Co., Ltd.", the predecessor of Hangzhou Dongheng Electric Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Dongheng company), infringed the trademark No. G715396. After the mediation and confirmation of the court, Dongheng company shall stop infringing the trademark No. G715396, change the enterprise name, and compensate Schneider China company for its economic losses and reasonable expenses totaling 100,000 yuan.

在先案件调解之后,东恒公司虽然进行了网站改版和企业更名,但此后又在网站首页、文章标题、产品价目表、产品链接等处,持续大量使用施耐德商标。同时,在北京奇志浩天科技有限公司(简称奇志浩天公司)经营的中国供应商网中展示有东恒公司的商品,其中有201条含施耐德商标商品链接,在介绍中亦大量使用“Schneider/施耐德中外文商标。上述行为一直持续至2019年。施耐德中国公司再次提起诉要求东恒公司赔偿损失300万元,奇志浩天公司在1万元范围内承担连带责任。

After the mediation of the previous case, although Dongheng company revised its website and changed its name, it continued to use the "Schneider" trademark in a large number of places such as the homepage, article title, product price list and product links. At the same time, in the "China supplier network" operated by Beijing Qizhihaotian Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Qizhihaotian company), where the products of Dongheng company were displayed, there were 201 product links with the "Schneider" trademark. In the product introduction, the Chinese and foreign trademarks "Schneider/施耐德" were also widely used. The above behavior continued until 2019. Schneider China company filed a lawsuit again to require Dongheng company to compensate for the loss of 3 million yuan, and Qizhihaotian company to bear joint and several liability within the range of 10,000 yuan.

一审法院认为,东恒公司的涉案行为属于在同一种或类似商品上使用与施奈德中国公司商标相同或近似的商标标识,易使相关公众对商品来源产生混淆,侵害了施耐德中国公司对涉案商标享有的权利,应当承担赔偿损失的法律责任。奇志浩天公司作为信息发布平台已经尽到了合理注意义务,并及时删除侵权链接,无需承担侵权责任。关于东恒公司应当赔偿的具体数额,综合考虑涉案商标的知名度、被诉行为系重复侵权、主观恶意明显,且持续时间较长等因素判决东恒公司赔偿施耐德中国公司经济损失300万元。该案一审判决已生效。

The court of first instance held that Dongheng company's act involved in the case belongs to the use of the same or similar trademark logo as Schneider China company on the same or similar goods, which is easy to confuse the relevant public about the source of the goods and infringes upon Schneider China company's rights to the trademark involved, and should bear the legal liability for compensation. As an information release platform, Qizhihaotian company had fulfilled the obligation of reasonable care and deleted the infringing links in a timely manner, so it does not need to bear the tort liability. As for the specific amount to be compensated by Dongheng company, it is decided that Dongheng company compensated Schneider China for the economic loss of 3 million yuan based on the comprehensive consideration of the popularity of the trademark involved, the repeated infringement of the sued act, the obvious subjective malice and the long duration. The first instance judgment of the case has come into effect.

点评:

Comments:

本案是充分考虑惩罚性因素从高确定法定赔偿数额的典型案例。本案虽然能满足惩罚性赔偿适用的法定要件,但因难以确定惩罚性赔偿的基数,法院充分考虑了惩罚性因素从高确定法定赔偿数额,全额支持了原告主张的赔偿数额300万元。本案裁判充分体现了对严重侵权行为加大惩处、严格保护知识产权要求的贯彻落实,有利于市场化、法治化、国际化营商环境的完善。

This case is a typical case in which punitive factors are fully considered to determine the amount of legal compensation at a high level. Although this case can meet the legal requirements for the application of punitive damages, it is difficult to determine the base of punitive damages, and the court fully considered the punitive factors to determine the amount of legal compensation from a high level, and fully supported the plaintiff's claim of compensation of 3 million yuan. The judgment of this case fully reflects the implementation of the requirements of increasing punishment for serious infringement act and strict protection of intellectual property rights, which is conducive to the improvement of the market-oriented, legal and international business environment.

(案件来源:北京市高级人民法院)

(Source of case: Beijing Higher People's Court)

集佳新闻:

集佳代理33件专利荣获第二十三届中国专利奖 连续多年领跑代理机构榜

33 Patents Represented by Unitalen won the 23rd China Patent Award, Leading the List of Agencies for Many Consecutive Years

2022726日,中国国家知识产权局公布了关于第二十三届中国专利奖授奖的决定,对在实施创新和推动经济社会发展等方面作出显著贡献的专利权人、发明人(设计人)以及相关组织者给予表彰。在本届中国专利奖评选中,集佳知识产权代理的案件再创佳绩,共有33项发明专利荣获本届中国专利奖,包括1项中国专利金奖、1项中国专利银奖和31项中国专利优秀奖。至此,集佳累计代理近200项专利获得了中国专利奖,连续多年领跑全国代理机构榜单。

On July 26, 2022, the CNIPA announced the decision on the 23rd China Patent Award, aiming at giving commendation to patentees, inventors (designers) who have made significant contributions in implementing innovation and promoting economic and social development and relevant organizers. In the selection of this year's China Patent Award, the cases represented by Unitalen achieved another success in that a total of 33 invention patents won this year's China Patent Award, including 1 Chinese patent gold award, 1 Chinese patent silver award and 31 Chinese patent excellent awards. So far, Unitalen has won the China Patent Award for nearly 200 patents represented thereby, leading the list of national agencies for many consecutive years.

附新闻链接:http://www.unitalen.com.cn/html/report/22074398-1.htm

Attached news link: http://www.unitalen.com.cn/html/report/22074398-1.htm

集佳律师事务所荣登“2020-2021中国优秀知识产权代理机构榜

Unitalen Law Office Honored in the "List of China's Excellent Intellectual Property Agencies in 2020-2021"

近日,“2020-2021中国优秀知识产权代理机构榜正式揭晓,北京市集佳律师事务所凭借长期以来在知识产权领域的卓越业绩和处理疑难案件的突出能力,从400余家知识产权代理机构中脱颖而出,荣登中国优秀知识产权代理机构商标行政榜TOP10”

Recently, the "List of China's Excellent Intellectual Property Agencies in 2020-2021" was officially announced. With its long-term outstanding performance in the field of intellectual property and outstanding ability to handle difficult cases, Beijing Unitalen Law Office stood out from more than 400 intellectual property agencies and was honored as a "Top 10 of China's Excellent Intellectual Property Agency Trademark Administration List".

此外, “2020-2021中国知识产权服务机构优秀代理榜TOP 50”。集佳知识产权凭借稳定的综合实力、卓越的专业服务及优异的成绩获得业界的广泛认可,荣登“2020-2021中国知识产权服务机构优秀代理榜TOP 50”榜单!

In addition, Beijing Unitalen Law Office was honored as a "Top 50 Excellent Agencies in China's Intellectual Property Service in 2020-2021". With its stable comprehensive strength, excellent professional services and excellent achievements, Unitalen has been widely recognized by the industry and has been listed in the "Top 50 Excellent Agencies in China's Intellectual Property Service in 2020-2021"!

集佳荣登MIP“2022知识产权之星IP STARS 2022)多个榜单

Unitalen Honored in Multiple Lists of MIP "IP STARS 2022"

近日,由国际知名知识产权媒体《知识产权管理》(Managing Intellectual Property, MIP)评选的“2022全球知识产权之星IP STARS 2022)各项榜单陆续发布,集佳知识产权荣登IP STARS“专利诉讼”“专利申请”“商标诉讼”“商标申请”“版权业务五大领域的推荐榜单。

Recently, various lists of "IP STARS 2022" selected by the internationally well-known intellectual property media Managing Intellectual Property (MIP) have been released one after another, and Unitalen has been honored in the recommended list of 5 fields including "patent litigation", "patent application", "trademark litigation", "trademark application" and "copyright business" in IP STARS.

同时,MIP全球知识产权个人奖项的评选结果也已公布,李德山律师、孙长龙律师、侯玉静律师和武树辰律师因其在各自领域的杰出表现和高度影响力,获MIP 2022 IP Stars,侯玉静律师同时入选“2022杰出IP女性榜单!

At the same time, the selection results of MIP global intellectual property individual awards have also been announced. Attorneys LI Deshan, SUN Changlong, HOU Yujing and WU Shuchen won MIP 2022 IP Stars for their outstanding performance and high influence in their respective fields, and attorney HOU Yujing was also selected into the list of "2022 Outstanding IP Women"!

集佳连续八年入选“IAM全球专利1000名录

Unitalen Has Been Selected into the List of "IAM Global Top 1000 Patents" for Eight Consecutive Years

近期,国际权威知识产权媒体《知识产权资产管理》(Intellectual Asset ManagementIAM)公布了2022年度“IAM全球专利1000评选结果,集佳连续八年入选专利确权专利诉讼两大领域的年度推荐事务所榜单。同时,集佳三位专利代理师以优异成绩入选杰出个人榜单,李德山律师获评专利诉讼专利确权两大领域杰出人物,李洋专利代理师长和潘炜律师获评专利确权领域杰出人物。

Recently, the internationally authoritative intellectual property media Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) announced the selection results of "IAM Global Top 1000 Patents" in 2022, and Unitalen was selected into the annual recommended firms in the fields of "patent prosecution" and "patent litigation" for eight consecutive years. Meanwhile, three patent attorneys of Unitalen were selected into the list of outstanding individuals with excellent achievements. Attorney LI Deshan was rated as an outstanding person in the fields of "patent litigation" and "patent prosecution", and patent agent LI Yang and attorney PAN Wei were rated as outstanding persons in the field of "patent prosecution".

About the Firm

Unitalen Attorneys at Law
Address 7th Floor, Scitech Place, No. 22 Jian Guo Men Wai Ave., Beijing, 100004 P. R. China
Tel 86-10-5920 8888
Fax 86-10-5920 8588
Email mail@unitalen.com
Link www.unitalen.com

Related Newsletters

28
SEP
2022
28
SEP
2022
业界新闻: 关于启动柬埔寨对中国相关外观设计加快认可登记项目的公告...

Read More

28
SEP
2022
28
SEP
2022
業界ニュース: カンボジアでの中国の意匠にかかる認可登録加速化プロ...

Read More

25
AUG
2022
25
AUG
2022
業界ニュース: 第23回中国専利賞の受賞者名簿が発表 先ごろ、中国国家...

Read More

10
AUG
2022
10
AUG
2022
业界新闻: 尼斯分类NCL11-2022文本中日韩商品和服务类似群编码对照表 Nice ...

Read More

25
JUL
2022
25
JUL
2022
集佳の視点: 専利民事行政交錯事件の処理に関する実務 北京市集佳法...

Read More

24
JUN
2022
24
JUN
2022
业界新闻: 中国国家知识产权局2021年度报告公布 China National Intellectual Prop...

Read More

24
JUN
2022
24
JUN
2022
業界ニュース: 中国国家知識産権局が2021年度報告書を公表 先ごろ、中...

Read More

23
MAY
2022
23
MAY
2022
业界新闻: 关于开通外观设计国际申请业务的通知 Notice on the Launch of the In...

Read More

23
MAY
2022
23
MAY
2022
業界ニュース: 意匠の国際出願業務の開始に関する通知 中国国家知識産...

Read More

05
MAY
2022
05
MAY
2022
业界新闻: 中欧亚专利审查高速路(PPH)试点项目延长 CNIPA-EAPO PPH Pilot Pro...

Read More

05
MAY
2022
05
MAY
2022
業界ニュース: 中国・ユーラシア特許審査ハイウェイ(PPH)試行プログ...

Read More

14
APR
2022
14
APR
2022
February 2022 业界新闻: 中国国家知识产权局关于调整专利电子申请专利...

Read More

14
APR
2022
14
APR
2022
February 2022 業界ニュース: 中国国家知識産権局による専利の電子出願...

Read More

09
MAR
2022
09
MAR
2022
January 2022 業界ニュース: 中国がWIPOの2つの重要な条約に加盟:「マラ...

Read More

09
MAR
2022
09
MAR
2022
January 2022 业界新闻: 中国加入产权组织两部重要条约:《马拉喀什条约...

Read More

08
MAR
2022
08
MAR
2022
December 2021 业界新闻: 关于启用尼斯分类第十一版2022文本的通知 Annou...

Read More

08
MAR
2022
08
MAR
2022
December 2021 業界ニュース: ニース分類第11-2022版の発効に関する通知 世...

Read More

05
JAN
2022
05
JAN
2022
業界ニュース: 中英両庁が知的財産権保護ガイドラインを共同発表 2021...

Read More

05
JAN
2022
05
JAN
2022
业界新闻: 中英两局共同发布知识产权保护指南 CNIPA and IPO UK Published Guidel...

Read More

20
DEC
2021
20
DEC
2021
业界新闻: WIPO年度报告:中国多项知识产权申请量居全球首位 WIPO Annual Re...

Read More

20
DEC
2021
20
DEC
2021
業界ニュース: WIPO年次報告書 中国が多くの項目で知的財産権出願件数...

Read More

26
NOV
2021
26
NOV
2021
業界ニュース: 「グローバル・イノベーション・インデックス」:中国...

Read More

26
NOV
2021
26
NOV
2021
业界新闻: 《全球创新指数报告》:中国升至第12位 China Rises to 12th Place in...

Read More

30
AUG
2021
30
AUG
2021
業界ニュース 第32回中仏知的財産権混合委員会ビデオ会議が開催  7...

Read More

30
AUG
2021
30
AUG
2021
业界新闻: 第32次中法知识产权混委会视频会议召开 7月20日,第32次中法...

Read More

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3