世界知识产权组织“WIPO Lex商业秘密判例集”数据库收录13篇中国裁判文书
13 Chinese Judgments Included in "WIPO Lex Trade Secrets Case Law Collection" Database of the WIPO
日前，世界知识产权组织（WIPO）官方网站上线“WIPO Lex商业秘密判例集”数据库（WIPO Lex Trade Secrets Case Law Collection），收录中国法院商业秘密裁判文书13篇，数量与美国并居首位。
Recently, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) launched the "WIPO Lex Trade Secrets Case Law Collection" database on the official website, which includes 13 trade secret judgments rendered by Chinese courts, placing China alongside the United States with the largest number of entries.
数据库目前共收录来自9个国家的66篇裁判文书，中国、美国各13篇，印度12篇、德国11篇、韩国5篇、意大利5篇、巴西4篇、英国2篇、坦桑尼亚1篇。13篇中国法院文书分别为：最高人民法院知识产权法庭“天然蛋白酶3”案、“橡胶防老剂”案、“汽车底盘”案、“沈鼓”案、“龙某世界”项目代码案、“卡波”案、“香兰素”案、“三聚氰胺”案，以及河南省高级人民法院“反光材料”案，上海市第一中级人民法院“礼来”案，上海市浦东新区人民法院“剧透”游戏未公开角色案，江苏省南京市中级人民法院“香菇多糖”案，广东省深圳市中级人民法院“智能检索算法”案。
The database currently contains 66 judgments from nine countries. China and the United States each account for 13 cases, followed by India with 12, Germany with 11, the Republic of Korea and Italy with 5 each, Brazil with 4, the United Kingdom with 2, and Tanzania with 1. The 13 judgments rendered by Chinese courts stem from the following: the "Natural Protease 3" Case, "Rubber Antioxidant" Case, "Automotive Chassis" Case, "Shenyang Blower" Case, "Dragon World" Project Code Case, "Carbomer" Case, "Vanillin" case, "Melamine" Case adjudicated by the Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People's Court; the "Reflective Material" Case by the Henan High People's Court; the "Eli Lilly" Case by the Shanghai First Intermediate People's Court; the Case of "Spoiler" of Unreleased Game Characters by the Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Court; the "Lentinan" Case by the Nanjing Intermediate People's Court of Jiangsu Province; and the "Intelligent Retrieval Algorithm" Case by Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court of Guangdong Province.
（来源：中华人民共和国最高人民法院官微）
(Source: Official WeChat account of the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China)
中国6家企业入围2026年产权组织全球奖名单
Six Chinese Enterprises Named Finalists for 2026 WIPO Global Awards
近日，世界知识产权组织（WIPO）公布2026年全球奖33强入围名单，中国有6家企业入围。
Recently, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) announced the 33 finalists for the 2026 Global Awards, with six Chinese enterprises making the cut.
中国6家入围企业包括：博萃循环(Botree)以锂电池回收、微构工场(Phabuilder)以低成本微生物生物塑料分别入围环境领域中小企业、初创企业；在健康领域，脉流科技(ArteryFlow)以人工智能心血管诊断平台、众生睿创(Raynovent)以抗耐药流感药物入围中小企业，吉美瑞生(Regend Therapeutics)以肺组织再生入围初创企业；乐奇(Rokid)以增强现实显示人工智能眼镜入围信息与通信技术领域中小企业。
The six shortlisted Chinese enterprises are: Botree Recycling, for its lithium battery recycling, and Phabuilder, for its low-cost microbial bioplastics, were shortlisted as a small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) and a startup respectively in the environment sector; in the health sector, ArteryFlow was shortlisted as the SME with its Artificial Intelligence (AI) cardiovascular diagnostic platform, Raynovent was shortlisted as the SME with its drug-resistant influenza medication, and Regend Therapeutics was shortlisted as a startup with its lung tissue regeneration technology; and Rokid was shortlisted as the SME in the information and communication technology (ICT) sector for its augmented reality (AR) display AI glasses.
获奖名单将于7月10日（星期五）在日内瓦举行的产权组织成员国大会期间现场公布。
The list of winners will be unveiled live on Friday, July 10, during the Assemblies of the Member States of WIPO in Geneva.
（来源：WIPO中国）
(Source: WIPO China)
典型案例：
Cases in Spotlight:
集佳助力知名潮牌EVISU在广东省高级人民法院获驰名商标跨类保护
Unitalen Empowers Renowned Streetwear Brand EVISU to Secure Cross-Class Protection for Well-Known Trademarks at the High People's Court of Guangdong Province
基本案情
Case Brief
捷尔普国际有限公司是全球知名服装潮牌“
”和“
”的注册商标所有人，该品牌自1994年进入香港市场，于 2001年在中国内地取得“
”注册商标专用权，2011年在中国内地开设专柜和专卖店。该潮牌自90年代至今，凭借其独有设计风格和高品质制作工艺在全球享有盛誉。2013年，广东省境内自然人罗某在第9类“耳机”商品抢注“
”商标，并在香港注册含“EVISU”字号的影子公司“
”。后罗某夫妻陆续抢注多枚“Evisu”、“
”商标。2017年起，罗某夫妻通过大量“刷单”制造使用假象，并在淘宝、拼多多、facebook及自建网站等平台宣传、销售侵权耳机，进一步扩大侵权规模。原告自2017年起不断通过异议、无效、撤三等行政程序维权，2022年罗某“ ”商标经撤三程序公告撤销，捷尔普公司于同年12月提起民事诉讼。
Gear Up International Limited is the owner of registered trademarks " " and " " for a globally renowned streetwear brand that entered the Hong Kong market in 1994. Gear Up acquired exclusive rights to the registered trademark "
" in the Chinese mainland in 2001 and opened counters and specialty stores there in 2011. Since the 1990s, this streetwear brand has enjoyed global prestige for its unique design style and high-quality craftsmanship. In 2013, a natural person surnamed LUO in Guangdong Province squatted the trademark " " for "headphones" under Class 9 and registered a shadow company, , incorporating the trade name "EVISU", in Hong Kong. Subsequently, LUO and his wife squatted multiple trademarks including "Evisu" and " ". Starting in 2017, LUO and his wife fabricated evidence of trademark use through extensive "click farming" and promoted and sold the infringing headphones across platforms such as Taobao, Pinduoduo, Facebook, and their self-built websites, further expanding the scale of infringement. Since 2017, Gear Up, as the plaintiff, has continuously safeguarded its rights through administrative procedures, including objections, invalidation, and cancellation for non-use over three consecutive years. In 2022, the trademark " " squatted by LUO was officially revoked following a cancellation procedure due to non-use in three consecutive years, and Gear Up filed a civil lawsuit in December of the same year.
法院认定
Ruling of the Court
深圳中院一审认定，罗某等侵害了捷尔普公司涉案驰名商标权利，且无正当理由拒不提交制造销售被诉商品的财务材料，构成举证妨碍，判令停止侵权、刊登声明并赔偿经济损失及合理开支共计100万元。罗某等不服一审判决，向广东高院提起上诉。广东高院二审维持原判。鉴于案件的典型性，在公开宣判后，除了本案主审法官对焦点问题进行“法官说法”外，广东省高级人民法院更是邀请业内知名专家对本案进行公开点评。
The Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court ruled in the first instance that LUO and other defendants infringed upon the involved well-known trademark rights of Gear Up. Furthermore, their refusal to submit financial materials regarding the manufacture and sale of the accused products without justifiable grounds constituted obstruction of adducing evidence. Consequently, the court ordered LUO and others to cease the infringement, publish a clarifying statement, and compensate for economic losses and reasonable expenses totaling RMB 1 million. Unsatisfied with the first-instance judgment, LUO and other defendants filed an appeal with the High People's Court of Guangdong Province. In the second instance, the High People's Court of Guangdong Province upheld the original judgment. Given the significance of the case, following the public announcement of the verdict, the presiding judge provided a "Judge's Commentary" on the critical issues, and the High People's Court of Guangdong Province further invited renowned industry experts to deliver a public commentary on the case.
典型意义
Typical Significance
本案是全球知名潮牌“ ”和“ ”在华首次获得驰名商标保护，集佳通过代理民事侵权与行政确权交叉配合打击手段，不仅有效制止了商标侵权行为，更将抢注长达十多年的注册商标连根拔除，取得行政和民事诉讼的全面胜诉！
This case marks the first time that the globally renowned streetwear brand EVISU has secured protection for its well-known trademarks " " and " " in China. Through a combination of civil infringement litigation and administrative rights prosecution, Unitalen not only effectively halted the trademark-infringing activities but also uprooted the squatted trademark that had persisted for over a decade, achieving a complete victory in both administrative and civil proceedings!
集佳助力蓝海智能装备专利维权连获两案胜诉
Unitalen Assists Lanhai Intelligent Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd. in Winning Two Consecutive Patent Protection Lawsuits
基本案情
Case Brief
蓝海智能装备制造有限公司（以下简称“蓝海公司”）是一家专注于凿岩台车、锚杆台车、拱架拱锚台车、湿喷机械手、掘进机等隧道机械生产厂家，产品广泛应用于公路、矿山、水利水电隧道工程，是国内先进的成套智能装备集成商。先后通过高新技术企业、专精特新“小巨人”企业、国家知识产权优势企业、四川省企业技术中心、成都市院士（专家）创新工作站等认证。
Lanhai Intelligent Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Lanhai") is a manufacturer specializing in tunnel machinery, including rock drilling rigs, anchor-bolt drilling rigs, arch-erecting and anchor-bolt rigs, wet-mix shotcrete manipulators, and tunnel boring machines (TBMs). Its products are widely used in highway, mining, water conservancy, and hydropower tunnel engineering, making it a leading domestic provider of integrated, complete sets of intelligent equipment. The company has successively obtained qualifications and certifications, including High-Tech Enterprise; Specialized, Refined, Differential, and Innovative "Little Giant" Enterprise; National Intellectual Property Advantageous Enterprise; Sichuan Provincial Enterprise Technology Center; and Chengdu Academician (Expert) Innovation Workstation.
蓝海公司一款热销拱架台车遭竞争对手全面仿制，直接导致市场份额流失与订单下滑，商业受损严重。遂启动专利维权程序，通过法律手段遏制侵权、恢复竞争优势。集佳接受委托后，制定了证据保全方案与诉讼策略，随后向成都市中级人民法院提交了选定专利的侵权纠纷的起诉材料。
One of Lanhai's best-selling arch-erecting rigs was entirely counterfeited by a competitor, resulting in a loss of market share, a decline in orders, and severe commercial damage. Consequently, Lanhai initiated patent protection procedures to curb the infringement and restore its competitive advantage through legal means. Upon accepting the commission, Unitalen formulated an evidence-preservation plan and litigation strategy and subsequently submitted the lawsuit materials regarding the infringement dispute over the selected patent to the Chengdu Intermediate People's Court.
维权关键节点
Key Nodes for Patent Protection
专利维权启动前，筛选恰当的维权目标专利系决定案件成败的关键前提。受托后，集佳团队在客户技术部门的配合下，梳理与被诉侵权产品具有技术关联性的专利组合；继而，综合考虑被诉侵权产品方案、侵权比对分析、侵权证据取证难度、专利稳定性，以及该专利在侵权产品整体技术方案中的核心贡献度与重要占比等多个维度进行综合评估，最终锁定维权目标专利。
Before initiating patent protection, selecting appropriate target patents is a key prerequisite for determining a case's success or failure. Upon accepting the commission, the Unitalen team, in collaboration with the client's technical department, thoroughly reviewed the patent portfolio technically correlated to the accused infringing product. Subsequently, a comprehensive evaluation was conducted across multiple dimensions, including the solution of the accused infringing product, an infringement comparison analysis, the difficulty of gathering infringement evidence, patent stability, as well as the patent's core contribution and significant proportion within the overall technical solution of the infringing product. Based on this thorough assessment, the target patent for protection was ultimately determined.
针对被告可能转移资产的风险，集佳团队在诉讼中及时启动财产保全程序，成功冻结被告多个银行账户。有效遏制了侵权行为的持续扩大，更提前锁定了被告的偿债能力，为后续损害赔偿的兑现提供了坚实保障，实现了对客户权益的全方位维护。
In response to the risk that the defendant might transfer assets, the Unitalen team promptly initiated property preservation procedures during the litigation, successfully freezing multiple of the defendant's bank accounts. This move not only effectively curbed the further expansion of the infringing activities but also secured the defendant's debt-paying ability in advance, providing a solid guarantee for the eventual enforcement of damages, and achieving comprehensive protection of the client's rights and interests.
诉讼期间，被告就两件涉案专利先后两轮向国家知识产权局提起无效宣告请求，成都中院据此先后两次裁定中止诉讼程序。其中，第二轮中止系在第一轮无效决定已认定专利权维持有效、案件恢复审理并完成开庭之后。面对两轮无效挑战，集佳团队均综合研判权利稳定性与侵权成立可能性，对权利要求书作出适应性修改。最终，两案的两轮无效宣告决定均认定：在修改后权利要求的基础上，涉案专利权应予维持有效。
During the litigation, the defendant filed two rounds of invalidity requests against the two patents at issue with the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA). Based on these requests, the Chengdu Intermediate People's Court twice ordered the suspension of the litigation proceedings. Notably, the second round of suspension occurred after the first-round invalidation decision had already upheld the validity of the patent rights, the case had resumed, and the court hearing had been completed. In the face of these two rounds of invalidity challenges, the Unitalen team comprehensively and systematically evaluated the patent's stability and the likelihood of establishing infringement and made adaptive amendments to the claims. Ultimately, the two invalidation decisions across the two rounds for both cases ruled that, on the basis of the amended claims, the patent rights at issue shall be maintained as valid.
诉讼程序恢复后，集佳团队针对修改后的权利要求提交了系统的侵权比对意见，法院据此进行了实体审理，随后判决两案侵权行为均成立，并判令被告赔偿蓝海智能装备经济损失。
Following the resumption of the litigation proceedings, the Unitalen team submitted opinions on systematic infringement for the amended claims. Based on these submissions, the court conducted a substantive trial and subsequently ruled that the infringement in both cases was established, ordering the defendant to compensate Lanhai Intelligent Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd. for its economic losses.
行业协会组织垄断协议反垄断行政系列案
Series of Administrative Cases against Monopolistic Activities Organized by Industry Association under Monopoly Agreements
案件信息
Case Information
原告：某省水泥协会（简称某水泥协会）
被告：某省市场监督管理局（简称某省市监局）
被告：国家市场监督管理总局
Plaintiff: Cement Association of [Redacted] Province (hereinafter referred to as the "[Redacted] Cement Association")
Defendant: Administration for Market Regulation of [Redacted] Province (hereinafter referred to as the"[Redacted] Provincial Administration for Market Regulation")
Defendant: State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR)
基本案情
Case Brief
某水泥协会系依法成立的行业协会，主要负责水泥行业指导、协调工作。2019 年 5 月，某省市监局接到举报，反映某水泥协会组织本行业企业联合涨价，涉嫌违反反垄断法。某省市监局依法调查后，于 2022 年 6 月作出行政处罚决定，认定某水泥协会组织、推动某省某区域 13 家水泥企业多次达成统一上涨水泥产品价格的横向垄断协议，并协调涉案企业实施，故责令其立即停止违法行为，并处罚款 50 万元。某水泥协会不服，向国家市场监督管理总局申请行政复议，国家市场监督管理总局复议维持原处罚决定。水泥协会向北京知识产权法院提起行政诉讼，请求撤销涉案行政处罚决定及行政复议决定。北京知识产权法院经审理认为，在案证据足以证明某水泥协会存在组织本行业经营者达成并实施横向垄断协议的行为，被诉行政处罚决定、行政复议决定认定事实清楚、适用法律正确、程序合法，判决驳回其诉讼请求。某水泥协会提起上诉，最高人民法院驳回上诉，维持原判。
The [Redacted] Cement Association is a legally established industry association primarily responsible for providing guidance and coordinating the cement industry. In May 2019, the [Redacted] Provincial Administration for Market Regulation received a whistleblower report alleging that the [Redacted] Cement Association had organized industry enterprises to jointly raise prices, constituting a suspected violation of the Anti-Monopoly Law. Following a lawful investigation, the [Redacted] Provincial Administration for Market Regulation issued an administrative penalty decision in June 2022. It determined that the [Redacted] Cement Association had organized and promoted 13 cement enterprises in a certain region of [Redacted] Province to repeatedly enter into horizontal monopoly agreements to uniformly increase cement product prices, and had coordinated the participating enterprises in implementing these agreements. Consequently, the administration ordered the association to immediately cease the illegal activities and imposed a fine of RMB 500,000. Dissatisfied with the decision, the [Redacted] Cement Association filed an application for administrative reconsideration with the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), which subsequently issued a reconsideration decision upholding the original penalty decision. The cement association then filed an administrative lawsuit with the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, seeking revocation of both the administrative penalty decision and the administrative reconsideration decision. Upon hearing the case, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court held that the evidence of record was sufficient to prove that the [Redacted] Cement Association had engaged in organizing business operators in the industry to reach and implement horizontal monopoly agreements. It further found that the challenged administrative penalty decision and administrative reconsideration decision were supported by clear facts, correct in the application of law, and lawful in procedure. Accordingly, the court ruled to dismiss the association's claims. The [Redacted] Cement Association filed an appeal, but the Supreme People's Court dismissed it and upheld the original judgment.
裁判要旨
Summary of Judgment
行业协会通过组建微信群、召开行业会议、组织聚会等方式，为经营者实施共谋提供沟通交流平台，协调、促使和推动经营者达成、实施垄断协议的，属于反垄断法所禁止的行业协会组织本行业经营者从事垄断行为。
Where an industry association provides a communication platform to facilitate collusion among business operators, by means such as establishing WeChat groups, convening industry meetings, or organizing social gatherings, and coordinates, induces, or promotes such business operators in reaching and implementing monopolistic agreements, such conduct constitutes the organization by an industry association of business operators in the industry to engage in monopolistic activities, which is prohibited by the Anti-Monopoly Law.
典型意义
Typical Significance
该系列案件作为首例涉行业协会反垄断行政案件，立足中国反垄断治理实践需求，为行业协会依法履职、反垄断执法机关精准执法、司法机关公正裁判提供了可落地、可参照的明确指引，彰显了司法维护公平竞争秩序、服务保障全国统一大市场建设的责任与担当。
As the first administrative anti-monopoly case involving an industry association, this series of cases addresses the practical needs of anti-monopoly governance in China, clearly providing feasible and referable guidance for industry associations to perform their duties in accordance with the law, for anti-monopoly enforcement authorities to achieve precise enforcement, and for judicial organs to render impartial judgments. Furthermore, it highlights the judiciary's responsibility and commitment to maintaining a fair competition order and to serving and safeguarding the development of a unified national market.
（案例来源：北京知识产权法院官微《2025年度案例》）
(Case Source: 2025 Annual Cases from Official WeChat account of the Beijing Intellectual Property Court)
集佳新闻：
Unitalen News:
集佳荣登 IP STARS 2026年度榜单 多位合伙人获评奖项
Unitalen Named to IP STARS 2026 Annual Rankings, with Multiple Partners Receiving Individual Awards
近日，国际权威媒体《知识产权管理》（Managing IP）公布了2026年度IP STARS中国区推荐榜单，集佳知识产权在专利申请（Patent prosecution）、专利争议解决（Patent disputes）、商标申请（Trade mark prosecution）、商标争议解决（Trade mark disputes）、著作权（Copyright）等多个重要领域荣膺IP Stars推荐事务所。
Recently, Managing IP, an international authoritative media outlet, announced the 2026 IP STARS China recommendation rankings. Unitalen Attorneys at Law was named as an "IP Stars" recommended firm across several key areas, including Patent Prosecution, Patent Disputes, Trade Mark Prosecution, Trade Mark Disputes, and Copyright.
同时，李德山副所长、武树辰律师和孙长龙律师获评“专利之星”（ Patent star 2026），侯玉静律师获评“专利之星”“商标之星”（Trade mark star 2026），李兵律师获评“知名律师”（Notable practitioner）。
Meanwhile, Deputy Director LI Deshan, Attorney WU Shuchen and Attorney SUN Changlong, were awarded the title of "Patent Star 2026", Attorney HOU Yujing was awarded the titles of "Patent Star 2026" and "Trade Mark Star 2026", while Attorney LI Bing was awarded the title of "Notable Practitioner".
集佳蝉联2026“IAM全球专利1000强”金牌事务所 多位合伙人荣登杰出个人推荐榜单
Unitalen Named Top-tier Firm Again in IAM Patent 1000 2026, with Multiple Partners on the Outstanding Individual Recommendations List
近日，国际权威知识产权媒体IAM（Intellectual Asset Management）公布了2026年度“IAM全球专利1000强”（IAM PATENT 1000）评选结果，集佳知识产权再次获评金牌事务所，连续12年入选“专利确权”和“专利诉讼”两大领域的年度推荐事务所榜单。
Recently, the international authoritative intellectual property media outlet IAM (Intellectual Asset Management) announced the selection results of the "IAM Patent 1000" in 2026, and Unitalen Attorneys at Law has once again been awarded a Top-tier firm and has been on the list of the annual recommended firms in the two fields of "Patent Prosecution" and "Patent Litigation" for 12 consecutive years.
同时，李德山副所长获评“专利诉讼”和“专利确权”两大领域杰出人物，李洋副所长、武树辰律师和潘炜博士获评“专利确权”领域杰出人物。
Meanwhile, Deputy Director LI Deshan was recognized as an outstanding individual in the two fields of "Patent Litigation" and "Patent Prosecution", and Deputy Director LI Yang, Attorney WU Shuchen and Dr. PAN Wei were recognized as outstanding individuals in the field of "Patent Prosecution".
集佳蝉联Asia IP 2026年度中国区多项大奖
Unitalen Retains Multiple Awards in China Region at the 2026 Asia IP Awards
近日，国际权威知识产权媒体《亚洲知识产权》（Asia IP）发布2026年度中国知识产权大奖（2026 China IP Awards）获奖名单，集佳知识产权再次荣登“专利确权”“专利诉讼”“商标确权”推荐榜单，并连续6年蝉联“区域大奖——年度北京事务所”（Regional Awards-Beijing）！
Recently, Asia IP, an international authoritative intellectual property media outlet, released the list of winners of the 2026 China IP Awards. Unitalen Attorneys at Law has once again been named on the recommendation lists for "Patent Prosecution", "Patent Litigation" and "Trademark Prosecution", and was honored with the award "Regional Awards-Firms of the Year (Beijing)" for the 6th consecutive year!
同时，在2026年商标调查评选结果中，集佳在商标争议解决和商标申请两项业务排名中均入选中国区第一梯队（Tier 1）！
Meanwhile, according to the results of the 2026 Trademark Survey, Unitalen was ranked Tier 1 in China for both Trade Mark Disputes and Trade Mark Prosecution.
.jpg)