新修订的《中华人民共和国商标法》2027年1月1日起施行
The Newly Revised Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China will Come into Effect on January 1, 2027
6月26日，十四届全国人大常委会第二十三次会议表决通过新修订的《中华人民共和国商标法》，2027年1月1日起施行。
On June 26, the 23rd Session of the Standing Committee of the 14th National People's Congress voted to adopt the newly revised Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China, which will come into effect on January 1, 2027.
新修订的商标法共9章87条，聚焦商标领域突出问题，明确商标工作的总体要求，规范商标注册，优化商标授权确权程序，强化商标管理，加强商标专用权保护。
Consisting of 9 chapters and 87 articles, the newly revised Trademark Law focuses on prominent issues in the trademark field, clarifies the general requirements for trademark work, regulates trademark registration, optimizes the procedures for trademark authorization and confirmation, reinforces trademark administration, and strengthens the protection of exclusive rights for trademarks.
1.附修订全文：中华人民共和国商标法
2.附修改对照表：2019&2026修改对照表
（来源：中国人大网、中华商标协会网站）
Attachment 1: Full Text of the Revised Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China
Attachment 2: Comparison Table of the 2019&2026 Revisions
(Source: the website of the National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China and the website of China Trademark Association)
2026年世界知识产权组织全球奖揭晓 中国获奖企业数量居首
WIPO 2026 Global Awards Announced: China Led in the Number of Award-Winning Enterprises
当地时间7月10日，在世界知识产权组织（WIPO）第68届成员国大会期间，2026年WIPO全球奖颁奖典礼于瑞士日内瓦举行。WIPO总干事邓鸿森向11家获奖企业代表颁奖。
On July 10, local time, during the 68th Conference of the Assemblies of the Member States of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the WIPO 2026 Global Awards ceremony was held in Geneva, Switzerland. WIPO Director General Daren Tang presented the awards to representatives from the 11 award-winning enterprises.
中国共有3家企业荣获WIPO全球奖，获奖数量居全球首位，分别来自环境和健康两大领域。其中，苏州博萃循环科技有限公司（环境领域中小企业）致力于提供新能源关键材料可持续发展的全套解决方案。杭州脉流科技有限公司（健康领域中小企业）专注于心脑血管疾病精准智能诊疗及解决方案。苏州吉美瑞生医学科技股份有限公司（健康领域初创企业）聚焦自体肺前体细胞疗法的研究。
A total of three Chinese enterprises won the WIPO Global Awards, ranking first globally in terms of the number of award winners. These enterprise winners represent the environment and health sectors. Among them, Botree (an SME in the environment sector) is dedicated to providing complete solutions for the sustainable development of key new energy materials; ArteryFlow (an SME in the health sector) focuses on precise and intelligent diagnosis, treatment, and solutions for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases; Regend Therapeutics (a startup in the health sector) is committed to the research of autologous lung progenitor cell therapies.
（来源：中国国家知识产权局网站）
(Source: the website of the CNIPA)
2026年欧洲发明家奖获奖名单揭晓，中国发明家获两项大奖
The List of European Inventor Award 2026 Announced: Chinese Inventors Secure Two Major Awards
当地时间7月2日，第十九届欧洲发明家奖颁奖典礼在德国柏林举行，欧洲专利局（EPO）现场公布本年度全球获奖者名单。
On July 2, local time, the ceremony for the 19th European Inventor Award was held in Berlin, Germany, where the European Patent Office (EPO) announced this year's global winners list.
中国广东邦普循环科技有限公司的发明人余海军、谢英豪及其研发团队，凭借智能电池定位回收技术，同时斩获“非欧洲专利局成员国奖”和“人气奖”两个奖项，成为本届评选中唯一同时获得两大奖项的创新团队。
Inventors YU Haijun and XIE Yinghao, along with their research and development team, from Guangdong Brunp Recycling Technology Co., Ltd., based in China, secured both the award in the Non-EPO Countries category and the Popular Prize for their smart battery-directed recycling technology. This made them the only innovation team in this year's selection to secure two major awards simultaneously.
（来源：中国国家知识产权局网站）
(Source: the website of the CNIPA)
《国务院关于对外投资的规定》于7月1日起施行
The Regulation of the State Council on Outbound Investment Came into Effect on July 1, 2026
7月1日起，中国对外投资领域的首部行政法规——《国务院关于对外投资的规定》正式施行。
As the first administrative regulation in China directed to outbound investment, the "Regulation of the State Council on Outbound Investment" officially came into effect on July 1.
《规定》共34条，旨在推进高水平对外开放，促进对外投资高质量发展，有效实施对外投资管理，保护中国境内对外投资者（企业、其他组织和居民个人）及其对外投资合法权益，维护国家主权、安全、发展利益。
Consisting of 34 articles, the regulation aims to promote high-standard opening up and the high-quality development of outbound investment, effectively implement outbound investment management, protect the legitimate rights and interests of outbound investors (enterprises, other organizations, and individual residents) in China and their outbound investment, and safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests.
支持咨询评估、法律服务、会计审计、信用评级、调解仲裁、知识产权等专业服务机构拓展海外服务网络，提高国际化服务能力和水平，为投资者及其对外投资提供高质量专业服务。
Meanwhile, professional providers of consulting and evaluation services, legal services, accounting and auditing, credit rating, mediation and arbitration, and intellectual property services are encouraged to expand overseas service realms, improve international service capabilities and levels, and provide high-quality professional services for investors and their outbound investment.
（来源：IPRdaily微信公众号）
(Source: WeChat official account of IPRdaily)
中国国家知识产权局与波兰共和国专利局延长“中波联络员机制”
"China-Poland Liaison Mechanism" between CNIPA and PPO Extended
中国国家知识产权局和波兰共和国专利局经磋商一致，决定将“中波联络员机制”延长五年，自2026年7月8日至2031年7月7日。
Following mutual consultations, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) and the Patent Office of the Republic of Poland (PPO) have decided to extend the "China-Poland Liaison Mechanism" for another five years, from July 8, 2026 to July 7, 2031.
联络员机制运行期间，中国企业在波如有发明、商标、工业品外观设计和实用新型相关咨询问题，可联系中国国家知识产权局知识产权联络员，联系方式如下：
During the operation of the liaison mechanism, Chinese enterprises with relevant inquiries regarding inventions, trademarks, industrial designs and utility models in Poland may contact the CNIPA IP liaison officer at the following details:
联络员：李瑞丰
Liaison Officer: Mr. LI Ruifeng
邮箱：ip_support@cnipa.gov.cn
Email: ip_support@cnipa.gov.cn
波兰企业在华如有相关咨询问题，可联系波兰专利局知识产权联络员，联系方式如下：
Polish enterprises with relevant inquiries in China may contact the PPO IP liaison officer at the following details:
联络员： Ms.Sylwia CAPIGA-WILEWSKA
Liaison Officer: Ms. Sylwia CAPIGA-WILEWSKA
邮箱：Sylwia.Capiga-Wilewska@uprp.gov.pl
Email: Sylwia.Capiga-Wilewska@uprp.gov.pl
（来源：中国国家知识产权局网站）
(Source: website of CNIPA)
典型案例：
Cases in Spotlight:
双案全胜！集佳代理欧洲某知名机械制造公司专利侵权案获赔200万元
Victory in Two Cases: Unitalen Represents a Renowned European Machinery Manufacturer in Patent Infringement Disputes, with Awarded Compensation of RMB 2 million
近日，由集佳代理的意大利某知名机械制造企业诉国内某工业设备企业侵害发明专利权纠纷两案，迎来全面胜利。江苏省无锡市中级人民法院就两案同日作出一审判决，全额支持原告200万元赔偿请求，并判令被告立即停止侵权。
Recently, Unitalen achieved a comprehensive victory in two dispute cases concerning the infringement of invention patents on behalf of a renowned Italian machinery manufacturer against a Chinese industrial equipment enterprise. On the same day, the Wuxi Intermediate People's Court of Jiangsu Province rendered first-instance judgments for both cases, fully supporting the plaintiff's claim for compensation of RMB 2 million and ordering the defendant to cease the infringement immediately.
案件概述
Case Summary
本案涉及意大利公司系列发明专利，涵盖产品专利与方法专利两大核心权利要求体系。
This case involves a series of invention patents owned by the Italian company, covering two core systems of claims: product patents and process patents.
被诉的大型工业设备通常采取定制化“交钥匙”模式，直接安装于第三方客户的封闭厂区内，权利人极难通过常规市场流通渠道获取实物证据。对此，集佳律师团队确立了“线上锁定初步证据、线下申请法院保全”的破局策略。
The accused large-scale industrial equipment is typically delivered on a customized "turnkey" basis and directly installed within the enclosed premises of third-party customers. Consequently, it is extremely difficult for the patentee to obtain physical evidence through conventional market circulation channels. To overcome this obstacle, Unitalen's attorney team established a breakthrough strategy of "locking in preliminary evidence online, and applying for court-ordered preservation offline".
本案审理期间，法庭共组织两次现场勘验。在第二次勘验中，集佳律师发现被诉侵权产品实物存在被切割、重新焊接及封堵预留接口等后期人为改动痕迹；同时，发现被告提交法庭的关键技术图纸亦存在篡改、抹除的变造线索。面对被告企图掩盖侵权特征的行径，律师当庭指出其恶意变造保全证据的妨碍诉讼行为。法庭最终全面采信了律师意见，依据《最高人民法院关于知识产权民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第二十五条第一款，认定被告实施了致使证据不能使用的行为，依法推定集佳律师就该证据所涉证明事项的主张成立。
During the trial of this case, the court organized two on-site inspections. During the second inspection, Unitalen's attorneys discovered signs of later manual alterations on the physical accused infringing product, such as cutting, re-welding, and sealing up reserved interfaces. Meanwhile, they further found evidence of tampering and erasure in the key technical drawings submitted by the defendant to the court. Facing the defendant's attempts to conceal the infringing features, the attorneys pointed out in court the defendant's acts of maliciously altering preserved evidence to obstruct civil proceedings. The court ultimately fully adopted the attorneys' opinions. Pursuant to Article 25, Para.1 of the Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Procedures of Intellectual Property Rights, the court determined that the defendant had committed acts resulting in the evidence being unusable, and thus presumed, in accordance with the law, that Unitalen's assertions regarding the facts to be proved by such evidence were established.
在专利侵权诉讼中，被告拒不提供财务账册，为证明B2B设备制造商存在侵权获利，集佳律师引入同类工业设备行业头部企业的公开招股书及财报，客观论证了该行业同类工业设备的平均利润率，并结合前期公证固定的设备单价及销量，清晰计算出一笔侵权获利明细账。
In the patent infringement litigation, as the defendant refused to provide its financial ledgers, Unitalen's attorneys, to prove the infringement profits of the B2B equipment manufacturer, introduced public prospectuses and financial reports of leading enterprises in the same industrial equipment industry. Through this, they objectively demonstrated the average profit margin of the same industrial equipment in the industry. Combined with the unit prices and sales volumes of the equipment previously secured through notarization, the attorneys meticulously presented a detailed statement of the infringement profits.
在原告已尽力举证而被告构成举证妨碍的情况下，法庭进一步明确指出，被告篡改图纸、破坏待勘验设备以刻意隐瞒侵权事实的情节恶劣，主观恶意明显。法庭最终将上述妨碍诉讼的行为作为确定赔偿金额的“惩罚性因素”予以重点考量，对两案各100万元（共计200万元）的赔偿诉求给予了全额支持。
Under the circumstances where the plaintiff had exhausted its efforts in adducing evidence while the defendant's actions constituted obstruction of adducing evidence, the court further explicitly pointed out that the defendant's acts of tampering with drawings and damaging the equipment to be inspected to deliberately conceal the infringement facts were egregious and demonstrated clear subjective malice. Ultimately, the court heavily weighed the above acts of obstructing litigation as "punitive factors" in determining the amount of compensation, fully supporting the claim for compensation of RMB 1 million for each of the two cases (totaling RMB 2 million).
案件意义
Case Significance
这一判决不仅圆满实现了权利人的知识产权维权诉求，更充分体现了人民法院对国内外当事人一视同仁、平等保护的法治担当。与此同时，该判决亦有力彰显了司法机关对恶意侵权、妨碍诉讼行为予以严厉惩戒的鲜明态度。
This judgment not only fulfilled the patentee's demands for intellectual property protection, but also fully demonstrated the people's court's legal responsibility to treat domestic and foreign parties equally and provide equal protection. Meanwhile, the judgment also powerfully underscores the judicial authority's unequivocal stance on imposing severe punishment on malicious infringement and acts that obstruct litigation.
传统建材领域专利如何推翻技术启示？集佳代理异型桩模具无效案获维持
How to Rebut Technical Inspirations for Patents in the Field of Traditional Building Materials? Unitalen Successfully Maintains the "Special-Shaped Pile Mold" Patent Valid in the Invalidation Case
近日，集佳代理的一起实用新型专利无效宣告案件取得有利审查结果。国家知识产权局作出第611477号审查决定，在专利权人修改权利要求的基础上，维持“异型桩模具”实用新型专利权有效。
Recently, a utility model patent invalidation case represented by Unitalen saw a favorable examination outcome. The China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) issued Examination Decision No. 611477, maintaining the validity of the utility model "Special-shaped Pile Mold", based on the amendments to the claims made by the patentee.
案情概述
Case Summary
本案涉及传统建筑材料领域。该领域技术路线相对成熟，现有技术和专利文献较为密集，创造性判断中容易出现以结果倒推技术启示的倾向。本案中，无效请求人针对全部10项权利要求提出无效请求，并提交7份专利文献作为证据，试图通过多份证据组合否定涉案专利的创造性。经审理，合议组最终认定相关无效理由不能成立。
This case involves the field of traditional building materials. The technical routes in this field are relatively mature, with a high density of prior art and patent literature, making inventiveness determinations prone to the pitfall of retroactively deriving technical inspiration from the results. In this case, the invalidation petitioner filed an invalidation request against all ten claims and submitted seven patent documents as evidence, attempting to deny the inventiveness of the patent involved through combinations of multiple pieces of evidence. Upon examination, the collegial panel ultimately determined that the relevant grounds for invalidation were untenable.
本案焦点在于：权利要求1中“相邻模壳段单元的对应内壁基面在模壳中心线垂面内的坐标方位角不相等”这一区别特征，是否已被现有技术公开，或者是否能够由现有技术给出明确技术启示。
The focus of this case lies in whether the distinguishing feature in Claim 1, namely, "the coordinate azimuths of the corresponding inner wall base surfaces of adjacent mold shell segment units within the plane perpendicular to the mold shell centerline are not equal", has been disclosed in the prior art, or whether the prior art can provide explicit technical inspirations.
请求人主张，证据3（一种混凝土管桩）公开了管桩外壁螺旋状凸起及凹槽，并认为凹槽可对应于本专利的模壳段单元异型部，由此能够得到“旋转错位分布”的技术启示。
The petitioner argued that Evidence 3 (a concrete pipe pile) disclosed spiral protrusions and grooves on the outer wall of the pipe pile, and contended that the grooves could correspond to the special-shaped portions of the mold shell segment units in the patent involved, thereby obtaining the technical inspiration of "rotationally staggered distribution".
代理团队围绕争议焦点提出三层回应：
The attorney team formulated a three-tiered argument addressing the key issue in dispute.
第一，产品结构并不当然等同于模具结构。证据3涉及的是混凝土管桩这一最终产品，并未直接公开成型模具的具体结构。管桩表面的凸起、凹槽属于产品外观特征，不能据此直接反推出模具内部的模壳段单元及其方位角关系。
Firstly, the product structure does not naturally equate to the mold structure. Evidence 3 concerns a concrete pipe pile as the final product and does not directly disclose the specific structure of the forming mold. The protrusions and grooves on the surface of the pipe pile are appearance features of the product, which cannot be used to directly reverse-engineer the mold shell segment units inside the mold and their azimuthal relationships.
第二，成型方法的不确定性影响推导链条。建筑领域管桩成型方法并非单一，证据3的层状螺旋结构并不能明确推定其必然采用传统模具成型，更不足以进一步推导出模具内部的具体构造。
Secondly, uncertainty about the forming method affects the chain of deduction. In the construction field, the forming methods for pipe piles are diverse. The layered spiral structure in Evidence 3 does not lead to a definite presumption that a traditional mold-forming process must be employed, let alone further speculation of the specific structure inside the mold.
第三，技术目的不同，难以当然得出相同技术启示。证据3设置凸起凹槽，目的在于“打桩时施加扭力、增大摩擦力、减少用料”；本专利调整方位角，目的在于“使桩体各单元承载能力一致，提高结构稳定性”。二者所解决的技术问题和实现路径并不相同。
Thirdly, given the different technical purposes, it is difficult to derive the same technical inspiration naturally. The purpose of providing protrusions and grooves in Evidence 3 is to "apply torsion force during pile driving, increase frictional force, and reduce material consumption". Conversely, the purpose of adjusting the azimuths in the patent involved is to "render the bearing capacity of each unit of the pile body consistent and improve structural stability". The technical problems solved and the implementation paths of Evidence 3 and the patent involved are completely different.
合议组采纳上述观点，认定权利要求1具备创造性；基于引用关系，权利要求2-9亦维持有效。
The collegial panel adopted the above arguments and determined that Claim 1 involves an inventive step. Consequently, based on their dependency relationships, Claims 2-9 were also maintained valid.
案件意义
Case Significance
本案对传统行业专利的确权和维权具有一定参考意义。在现有技术文献较为密集的领域，创造性判断不能停留在特征罗列和表面相似性比较上。现有技术的公开内容、技术目的、适用场景以及本领域技术人员能否形成明确改进动机，均需要结合案件事实作具体分析。
This case holds significant reference value for the right confirmation and protection of patents in traditional industries. In fields with a high density of prior art literature, the assessment of inventiveness must not be confined to a mere listing of features or a superficial comparison of similarities. The disclosure, technical purposes, and application scenarios of the prior art, as well as whether those skilled in the art can hold a clear motivation for improvement, shall all undergo concrete analysis in light of the facts of the case.
集佳新闻：
Unitalen News:
海峡两岸商标合作二十周年 | 张海旭所长获颁纪念证书
The 20th Anniversary of Cross-Strait Trademark Cooperation | Director ZHANG Haixu was Honored with Commemorative Certificate
2026年6月29日上午，由中华商标协会、海峡两岸商务协调会联合主办的海峡两岸商标合作二十周年座谈暨纪念会在京成功举办。作为里程碑见证，中华商标协会与海峡两岸商务协调会共同为二十年间长期支持、推动两岸商标交流合作的机构和个人授予纪念证书。
On the morning of June 29, 2026, the Symposium and Commemoration marking the 20th Anniversary of Cross-Strait Trademark Cooperation, jointly organized by the China Trademark Association (CTA) and the Cross-Strait Business Coordination Committee (CSBCC), was successfully held in Beijing. As a tribute to this historic milestone, the CTA and the CSBCC jointly presented commemorative certificates to organizations and individuals that have long dedicated themselves to supporting and promoting cross-strait trademark exchanges and cooperation over the past two decades.
本次纪念会上，张海旭所长获颁纪念证书。未来，集佳将继续为促进两岸商标品牌合作和两岸营商环境改善贡献力量。
At the Commemoration, Director ZHANG Haixu was honored with the commemorative certificate. Looking ahead, Unitalen will continue to contribute to promoting cross-strait trademark brand cooperation and improving the cross-strait business environment.
.jpg)