Filter

Open

MakeMyTrip Pvt. Ltd. v. Booking.com & ors. - Trademark Infringement by a Third Party Using Google Ad Words

22

NOV

2022

Introduction

The internet or the cyberspace has had a significant impact on our personal and social lifestyle. Businesses are also shifting to the digital realm in order to meet the market's ever-increasing demand. So, in order to divert web traffic to their businesses, companies nowadays use a variety of marketing and advertising strategies. One of such strategies involves the Search advertisement which has a distinct benefit of placing relevant ads in front of a target customer at the exact time the customer expresses his or her interest while surfing the internet. Hence, showcasing the most appropriate ads to the target customers at the right time is the main purpose of online advertisement. If you've ever used Google to look for useful information online, you're certainly not the only one to have searched for information in this manner. Most buyers explore the internet to look for highly relevant information, compare products/services, and read helpful reviews before approaching a business to indulge with them.

What is Keyword Advertising?

Keyword advertising, such as Google Ads and Meta-Tags, are few of the important virtual tools that majority of the organizations have been employing to extend their Internet presence and attract clients to their websites in this approach. Metatags has been defined by the court in the case of Mattel inc. & Ors. v/s Jayant Agarwalla & Ors.[1] in which it was said that ‘meta-tags are machine-readable codes used by search engines to index sites. These codes define the functionality of a website by a website owner and that the use of a trademark as meta-tags constitutes infringement and passing off.’[2]

How does the Google Ads Program work?

The Google Ads program allows anyone to bid on keywords that may contain their trademark. Competitors compete for each other's trademarks in order to improve the visibility of their goods and services on the search engine. As a result, a trademark owner must bid for its own property, or else its competitors will be able to use the registered trademark to advertise their own goods and services. As a result, the owner is compelled to invest in the Google Ads Program.[3]

The constant growth of search engine advertising in India appears to have led to an increase in trademark infringement cases based on alleged keyword misuse. Several trademark owners are seeking protection from their competitors' misusing their trademarks in an attempt to increase the appearance of their own advertisements on Google searches to promote their own services.

In the present predicament, the question is whether using third-party trademarks in Google advertisements or meta tags constitutes trademark infringement? This was deal with by the Court in the case of MakeMyTrip India Private Limited vs Booking.com B. V. & Ors.[4]

Brief Facts-

In the present case, both MakeMyTrip and Booking.com are online travel portals which are used for booking air tickets, hotels, holiday packages etc. The Plaintiff- MakeMyTrip (India) Pvt. Ltd. had filed a suit seeking permanent injunction in order to protect its registered trademark ‘MakeMyTrip’ and its variants against being used by the Defendant No.1- Booking.com B.V. as keywords on the Google Ads Program to promote the Defendant No.1’s services as advertisements when the search results are displayed on the Google search engine.

The case made by the Plaintiff is that often the first search result would be an advertisement of the Defendant No.1’s services upon entering the keyword ‘MakeMyTrip’. The Plaintiff contended that such use would amount to an infringement of their trademark which would result in a significant monetary loss given it is being done by one of their leading competitors.

Defendant No.1 argued while relying on the ‘Guess[5] Judgement, that there cannot be any restrictions on usage of a trademark on the Google Ads Program, as a keyword, including by competitors. The other defendant presented a similar case that such usage would infact not constitute a trademark infringement.

Judgement-

The court held “that the use of the Plaintiff’s registered mark ‘MakeMyTrip’ on the Google Ads Program as a keyword would amount to trademark infringement.” It further reiterated that such a use would be “detrimental to the Plaintiff’s monetary interest as also to the brand equity of the Plaintiff’s mark. To allow competitors such as www.booking.com and even Google to encash upon the reputation of the Plaintiff’s mark for their own monetary advantage is not permissible in the opinion of the Court.”

While granting an injunction with the reasoning that if not granted it would cause an irreparable injury to the Plaintiff, the court further directed the Defendants to restrain from using the mark ‘MakeMyTrip’ for using it as a keyword on the Google Ads Program till the next date of hearing.

Conclusion-

Online advertising has been the most convenient approach for businesses to advertise and market their products and services in the last decade or so. The Internet's capability to locate, connect, and target customers is, of course, unparalleled.

This order has come in at such a time where in cases against the use of trademarks on the Google Ad Programs by competitors are on a significant rise. The jurisprudence that has been evolved by the Courts so far regarding usage of ‘keywords’ or ‘metatags’ by competitors and/or third parties like a search engine such as Google on its Advertising program, has set forth a precedent to be followed in order for settlement of disputes arising out of such a use and will ensure against promotion of goods and services through advertisements that can be misleading.

It can be inferred in light of the current as well similar judgements on this subject matter that the courts tend to reach the conclusion that they do keeping solely in mind the monetary along with a loss in reputation incurred by a business. To be able to understand the reasoning of the court in a more lucid manner, tangible data through consumer surveys could make the current precedent more robust for future disputes on the same lines.

Author Details- Name- Adya Khanna. 3rd year of law at Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email to chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com or at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.


[1] Mattel inc & Ors v/s Jayant Agarwalla & Ors 2008 (153) DLT 548.

[2] Harsh Gehlot, ‘Are Keywords Considered for Trademark Infringement?’ (ZEST IP) https://zestip.com/are-keywords-considered-for-trademark-infringement/ accessed 17 September 2022.

[3] Sangita Sharma, ‘MakeMyTrip vs Booking.com – Looking at the Delhi High Court Injunction on Usage of AdWords’ (Spicy IP, 2 May 2022) https://spicyip.com/2022/05/makemytrip-vs-booking-com-looking-at-the-delhi-high-court-injunction-on-usage-of-adwords.html accessed on 17 September 2022.

[4] MakeMyTrip India Private Limited vs Booking.com BV & Ors CS (COMM) 268/2022.

[5] Case AT 40428 of 2018.

About the Firm

Khurana and Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Address E-13, UPSIDC, Site-IV, Behind-Grand Venice, Kasna Road, Greater Noida - 201310, UP, National Capital Region, India.
Tel 91-120-4296878, 91-120-4909201, 91-120-4516201
Fax 91-120-4516201
Email info@khuranaandkhurana.com
Link www.khuranaandkhurana.com

Related Articles

22
NOV
2022
An Overview Of Arbitrability Of Intellectual Property Disputes
22
NOV
2022
INTRODUCTION The number of patents, trademarks and domain name registrations has increased exponent...

Read More

04
NOV
2022
Protection of Copyrights in Indonesia
04
NOV
2022
Copyright law in Indonesia is a legal framework that encourages entrepreneurs to run their business ...

Read More

14
OCT
2022
Naked Licensing in the United States
14
OCT
2022
Introduction The term license is derived from the Latin word “license” which means to a...

Read More

08
OCT
2022
Trademark Licensing in Malaysia
08
OCT
2022
Introduction Licensing is a business arrangement commonly regarded as an alternative to franchising...

Read More

08
OCT
2022
Protection of Geographical Indications in the United States
08
OCT
2022
The use of GIs has become a contentious international trade issue, particularly for U.S. wine, chees...

Read More

14
SEP
2022
Vietnam Joins WIPO Copyright Treaty
14
SEP
2022
Copyright is an important part of intellectual property rights. Copyright protection plays a cruc...

Read More

08
SEP
2022
Compulsory Licensing in Indonesia
08
SEP
2022
Introduction Hepatitis C is one of viral diseases that requires special medication. As a viral dise...

Read More

08
SEP
2022
Interplay Between Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Law in the USA
08
SEP
2022
The relationship between intellectual property (IP) and disciplines regulating competition has attra...

Read More

15
AUG
2022
Patentability Search of Plants
15
AUG
2022
A patent search or patentability search is also known as a prior art search or a novelty search. Thi...

Read More

15
AUG
2022
Patent Laws of Malaysia
15
AUG
2022
Malaysia is a common law country and is governed by the doctrine of judicial precedent (stare decisi...

Read More

03
AUG
2022
Single Colour Trademarks - A Prevailing Conundrum
03
AUG
2022
There was a strong need to compete in the business sector due to expanding industrialization. ...

Read More

20
JUL
2022
Copyright Authorship to Artificial Intelligence
20
JUL
2022
Copyright is an exclusive right granted to the author of an original work. It is a protection provid...

Read More

20
JUL
2022
Removal of Unified GCC Patent System
20
JUL
2022
The Gulf Cooperation Council, also known as the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf,...

Read More

15
JUL
2022
Compulsory Licensing For Expensive Medicines 
15
JUL
2022
The Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE) has released a...

Read More

17
JUN
2022
Intellectual Property Risks with Respect to Digital Technology
17
JUN
2022
Introduction Throughout the life of an IP right, intellectual property risk management is the...

Read More

09
JUN
2022
All Comic Cons Titles Are Not Generic in Nature!!
09
JUN
2022
The case involves Dan Farr Production (Defendants) usage of the term “Salt Lake Comic Con&r...

Read More

27
MAY
2022
Patent of Addition under Indian Patents Act, 1970
27
MAY
2022
The possibility of improving or modifying an invention remains open once an invention has been devel...

Read More

18
MAY
2022
Frappuccino: Made By Starbucks and Used ONLY By Starbucks
18
MAY
2022
Introduction Who doesn’t like to indulge in the sweet, creamy and chilled Starbucks FRAPPUCCI...

Read More

09
MAY
2022
Trade Mark Dilution: A Case to be Looked Upon
09
MAY
2022
Adidas is a leading manufacturer of athletic apparel and footwear. Skechers is one of the largest f...

Read More

26
APR
2022
IP Protection in The Metaverse
26
APR
2022
Introduction Metaverse is a virtual reality world in which people are supposed to socialize, pla...

Read More

13
APR
2022
Fanfiction, Fan-Culture , Fan Art, and Copyright Law
13
APR
2022
Fanfiction, Fan-Culture, Fan art ,And Copyright Law In popular culture, fans take up a space of sign...

Read More

06
APR
2022
Groundless Threats for Patent Infringement: Analysing S.106 of Patents Act,1970
06
APR
2022
INTRODUCTION A groundless threat is one when a party threatens another party with legal proceedings...

Read More

11
MAR
2022
Identical Trademarks: A dilemma of Textual interpretation v. Contextual interpretation of a Statute
11
MAR
2022
Introduction In the case of Renaissance Hotel Holdings INC Vs B Vijaya Sai (2022), an appeal was re...

Read More

03
MAR
2022
Indian Advent in Any Types of Arbitration of IP Dispute - The Need to Clear the Judicial Enigma
03
MAR
2022
The Indian advent in any types of arbitration of IP dispute judiciary has been active and diligent i...

Read More

11
FEB
2022
DRS Logistics Vs Google: Liability for Using Third Party Trademarks as Keywords
11
FEB
2022
INTRODUCTION With advancements in technology and the introduction of the Internet, our personal ...

Read More

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4