Filter

Open

Removal of Unified GCC Patent System

20

JUL

2022

The Gulf Cooperation Council, also known as the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf, is a trade bloc that involves six states: Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and United States of Emirates. The former Patent Regulation system came into force after the GCC Patent Regulation and the Statute of the GCC Patent Office were granted approval during the 13th Summit meeting held in Abu Dhabi on 21 and 2 September 1992. The system was solely for protection of the patent in the six states of the GCC.

The major change is that the GCC Patent Office (GCCPO) will cease to operate the unified filing system for the GCC member states, effective 4th January 2021. However, the patent protection can be attained at the national levels in individual countries. The meeting resulted in an amended GCC Patent Regulation issued in May 2021 and was implemented in November 2021.

GCC, Patent Unified System, Patent regulations

Article 32 of the GCC Patent Law confers the authority on the Commercial Cooperation Committee to issue the implementing regulations of the law. With reference to this Article, the Committee approved, in its sixtieth meeting held on 27th June 2021, on the implementing regulations amending for the GCC Patent System. The implementing Bylaws of the amended law were published on 1st November 2021 and were effective from 1st February 2022. The new Bylaws define and explain the roles of the new committees as well as authorities established, the procedures involved in their work, governing law and the relationship between the national offices and the GCC Patent Office.

The key change was brought in the introduction of Article 1 (bis) and its provisions wherein the GCC Patent Office may only accept the new patent filings and examine them at the request of the GCC national offices. In all cases, no patent will be granted without the approval of the requesting national office(s). The patent granted shall only be enforceable in the country or countries which have requested for the registration. The system is different from the previous one wherein the applications were independently received, examined and granted by the GCC and such applications were automatically valid in all the six member states.

Based on the new changes, the new applications shall be accepted based on the following conditions:

  • The GCC Patent Office will accept and handle the patent applications, their examination, prosecution and grant, only when requested by the Member State(s).
  • The grant of patents will be subject to the approval of the Member State(s).
  • The granted patent shall only have effect in the requesting State(s).

Key Amendments made by the Bylaws:

  1. The Implementing Bylaws provide an option to the national offices to elect the GCC Patent Office as the filing, granting and examination authority. All the applications have to be given serial numbers according to the date and time of submission post the payment of requisite fees.
  2. The Byelaws provided different options with the national offices to elect the GCC Patent Office for applications. First, the patent office received the patent application and then examines it formally in accordance with the existing laws. Then, it is referred to the national competent authority within 120 days and further steps are carried on by the authority. The second option is that the patent office examines the application formally first and after it passes this stage, the application is substantively examined for the basic requirements of patents. The application shall then be referred to the national competent authority for observations to be provided within 30 days. The national competent authority can then provide its decision for granting the patent or not. The last option is that the patent office completes the activities from receiving the application to granting the patent on its own. Under this, after a formal and substantive examination, the national competent authority is asked for the comments. If no comments are received within the stipulated time frame, then the grant shall be automatic and in case, the authority rejects the application, then the same shall be communicated to the applicant.
  3. After this amendment, the name of the country/countries in which the protection is sought must be provided on the first page of the patent issued by the office.
  4. In case, the country/countries appoint the GCC Patent Office to act as the filing, examination and granting authority, the authority must transfer the annual fee for the patent granted to the concerned authority.

Thus, these are the main changes brought by the implementing Bylaws in the gulf countries.

Additionally, Articles 6 and 7 of the new Regulations set out the requirements for filing a ‘provisional document’. The document is available for the applicants who wish to demonstrate their invention publicly at a formal exhibition in the GCC state and seek a temporary protection for a potential invention. The document shall be valid for up to six months from the date of formal opening of the exhibition. The applicant can then apply for the registration without showcasing the novelty again.

The fees for the applicants have also been reduced. It is set at SAR 1500 (USD 400) for individual applicants and SAR 3000 (USD 800) for corporate applicants.

Therefore, the new model of the GCC Patent System is a positive step towards creating a stringer and efficient patent system in the region so that it is closely harmonised with the international patent systems.

Conclusion

The removal of a unified patent system and the key changes brought forward by the rules and regulations clearly indicate the benefits and the complications of the future. The applicants are benefitted because they need not apply twice in the national office as well as the GCC patent office to attain national as well as regional registration respectively. Under the new system, the national offices shall be responsible of attaining the registration in the requested country or countries by the applicant. Moreover, the national authority will also be able to request the patent office or competent authority to process the application and examine it to subsequently pass the grant. One of the drawbacks can be that pressure and multiple applications as well as processes might pile up for the patent office once the national authorities pass on their work. Therefore, the future holds the way in which proceedings shall be carried on.

Author: Tanya Saraswat – a student of Institute of Management Studies (NMIMS), in case of any queries please contact/write back to us via email chhavi@khuranaandkhurana.com. or at Khurana & Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorney.

About the Firm

Khurana and Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys
Address E-13, UPSIDC, Site-IV, Behind-Grand Venice, Kasna Road, Greater Noida - 201310, UP, National Capital Region, India.
Tel 91-120-4296878, 91-120-4909201, 91-120-4516201
Fax 91-120-4516201
Email info@khuranaandkhurana.com
Link www.khuranaandkhurana.com

Related Articles

15
AUG
2022
Patentability Search of Plants
15
AUG
2022
A patent search or patentability search is also known as a prior art search or a novelty search. Thi...

Read More

15
AUG
2022
Patent Laws of Malaysia
15
AUG
2022
Malaysia is a common law country and is governed by the doctrine of judicial precedent (stare decisi...

Read More

03
AUG
2022
Single Colour Trademarks - A Prevailing Conundrum
03
AUG
2022
There was a strong need to compete in the business sector due to expanding industrialization. ...

Read More

20
JUL
2022
Copyright Authorship to Artificial Intelligence
20
JUL
2022
Copyright is an exclusive right granted to the author of an original work. It is a protection provid...

Read More

15
JUL
2022
Compulsory Licensing For Expensive Medicines 
15
JUL
2022
The Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE) has released a...

Read More

17
JUN
2022
Intellectual Property Risks with Respect to Digital Technology
17
JUN
2022
Introduction Throughout the life of an IP right, intellectual property risk management is the...

Read More

09
JUN
2022
All Comic Cons Titles Are Not Generic in Nature!!
09
JUN
2022
The case involves Dan Farr Production (Defendants) usage of the term “Salt Lake Comic Con&r...

Read More

27
MAY
2022
Patent of Addition under Indian Patents Act, 1970
27
MAY
2022
The possibility of improving or modifying an invention remains open once an invention has been devel...

Read More

18
MAY
2022
Frappuccino: Made By Starbucks and Used ONLY By Starbucks
18
MAY
2022
Introduction Who doesn’t like to indulge in the sweet, creamy and chilled Starbucks FRAPPUCCI...

Read More

09
MAY
2022
Trade Mark Dilution: A Case to be Looked Upon
09
MAY
2022
Adidas is a leading manufacturer of athletic apparel and footwear. Skechers is one of the largest f...

Read More

26
APR
2022
IP Protection in The Metaverse
26
APR
2022
Introduction Metaverse is a virtual reality world in which people are supposed to socialize, pla...

Read More

13
APR
2022
Fanfiction, Fan-Culture , Fan Art, and Copyright Law
13
APR
2022
Fanfiction, Fan-Culture, Fan art ,And Copyright Law In popular culture, fans take up a space of sign...

Read More

06
APR
2022
Groundless Threats for Patent Infringement: Analysing S.106 of Patents Act,1970
06
APR
2022
INTRODUCTION A groundless threat is one when a party threatens another party with legal proceedings...

Read More

11
MAR
2022
Identical Trademarks: A dilemma of Textual interpretation v. Contextual interpretation of a Statute
11
MAR
2022
Introduction In the case of Renaissance Hotel Holdings INC Vs B Vijaya Sai (2022), an appeal was re...

Read More

03
MAR
2022
Indian Advent in Any Types of Arbitration of IP Dispute - The Need to Clear the Judicial Enigma
03
MAR
2022
The Indian advent in any types of arbitration of IP dispute judiciary has been active and diligent i...

Read More

11
FEB
2022
DRS Logistics Vs Google: Liability for Using Third Party Trademarks as Keywords
11
FEB
2022
INTRODUCTION With advancements in technology and the introduction of the Internet, our personal ...

Read More

08
FEB
2022
Can a Passing-off Action be Filed against The Infringement of Shape of a Good? A Case Analysis
08
FEB
2022
Introduction: Have you ever wondered if a bottle shape may be trademarked? Typically, The Designs...

Read More

21
JAN
2022
Cybersquatting & Regulatory Mechanisms
21
JAN
2022
Cyber Squatting is a word that has come to be linked with the registration of domain names without t...

Read More

13
JAN
2022
Intellectual Property Insurance – A Look into The Future
13
JAN
2022
The rise of the start-up culture in India has led to a huge influx of investment in the Indian ma...

Read More

20
DEC
2021
The Paradigm Shift in the Online Gaming Industry in India
20
DEC
2021
INTRODUCTION The relentless growth of the online gaming industry in India has posed a great chal...

Read More

07
DEC
2021
NFT and Its Relationship with IPR
07
DEC
2021
The non-fungible tokens [hereinafter referred to as “NFTs” have been the talk of the ...

Read More

15
NOV
2021
Enantiomer Patents: Non Obviousness in Secondary Pharmaceutical Patents
15
NOV
2021
Enantiomers, Racemate & Chirality ‘Stereochemistry’ is the study of spatial arrangem...

Read More

09
NOV
2021
Demystifying Fashion Law in India
09
NOV
2021
One of the niche areas of law, Fashion Law, is growing in existence in India. There might not be a c...

Read More

19
OCT
2021
An Overview on Trademark Bullying in Commercial Environments
19
OCT
2021
A trademark is an essential component of a brand’s image. In a broad sense, trademarks are sym...

Read More

19
OCT
2021
Publicity Rights in India: Need for Post-Mortem Recognition
19
OCT
2021
Right to Publicity relates to the right to control one’s identity and ensure protection agains...

Read More

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4