Filter

Open

Court Recognizes The Seriousness of Medicinal Trademarks

26

MAY

2021

Recently, the Delhi High Court decided the case of Mankind Pharma Limited vs Novakind Bio Sciences Private Limited wherein an order directing an ex-parte ad-interim injunction was granted in favour of the plaintiff company, Mankind. The court directed the defendant company, Novakind, to halt the manufacturing, marketing, and/or selling any pharmaceutical product bearing the suffix ‘Kind’ or any other similar mark which may violate the plaintiff’s intellectual property rights.

The plaintiff sought for a temporary injunction against the defendant by the way of restraining them from using the plaintiff’s family of marks with the word ‘Kind’ as an element of a brand name, ‘Novakind Bio Sciences Private Limited’, ‘Defzakind’ as a brand name for medicinal and pharmaceutical preparations.

The plaintiff was one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in India and held proprietorship over the mark ‘Mankind’ with 78 registrations in 45 classes. The mark had been certified as a well-known mark by the Registrar of Trademarks. The plaintiff also held 120 registrations in class 5 wherein the suffix ‘Kind’ had been prominent throughout different marks like ‘Dexakind’, ‘Dentakind’, ‘Metrokind’ and ‘Moxikind’. Based on this, the plaintiff claimed that the suffix was a crucial feature in its family of marks.

The plaintiff cited the orders passed by this court in the cases of Mankind Pharma Ltd vs. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd and Mankind Pharma Ltd vs. Sebakind Pvt Ltd., which bore similar circumstances and the court granted the requested injunctions.

They also claimed fraud by the defendant and submitted a strip of one of the products of the defendant ‘Defzakind’.

They claimed that the defendant is using misleading insignia on both of its marks. The mark ‘Defzakind’ was portrayed as a valid mark, the application for which stood abandoned due to non-filing of counterclaim. ‘Novakind Biosciences’ was depicted as a registered mark but the application of the same was in process.

It was submitted that the defendant was defrauding the public by placing on record the data extracted from the master data records of the Registrar of Companies which showed that the defendant’s registered office is in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, contrary to the address which has been published on the product.

The court cited the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Cadila Health Care Ltd vs. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd wherein it was held that confusion between medicinal products can be life threatening and the test of confusing similarity is modified when pharmaceutical products are involved.

The court held that the suffix ‘Kind’ was common to all products of the plaintiff and had attained distinctiveness. The use of the suffix by the defendant indicated infringement by the defendant in order to confuse and deceive the public into believing that the products belonged the plaintiff company.

Further, the court took a more serious approach towards deciding this matter and noted that “the defendant is probably resorting to misrepresentation regarding the registration of its trademarks as well as the location of its registered office, on the body of its products. Given the fact that the products of the defendant are pharmaceutical products, this is a serious matter, and entirely justifies the prayer of the plaintiff for ad interim injunction.”

The matter has not been decided in its entirety and further hearings are scheduled.

This case highlights the grave consequences confusing trademarks can have, especially in the case of pharmaceutical products. A slight mistake can lead a consumer to fatality. While deciding or choosing a trademark for any medicinal product, the owner must conduct due diligence to avoid similarities. The trademark registry assists in this regard. Also, the details related to the name of the company, address, consumer helpline, must be legible and clear so that a complaint can be seamlessly processed without misrepresentations. Prime importance must be given to the benefit of the consumers.

About the Firm

LexOrbis
Address 709-710 Tolstoy House, 15-17 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi – 110001
Tel 91-11-2371 6565
Fax 91-11-2371 6556
Email manisha@lexorbis.com
Link www.lexorbis.com

Related Articles

08
AUG
2022
Amendment of Product by Process Claim to a Process Complies Section 59(1)
08
AUG
2022
A recent judgement in matter of Nippon A&L Inc. V. The Controller of Patents dated 5th July 2022 ...

Read More

31
JUL
2022
Fraud in Obtaining Patent and Revocation
31
JUL
2022
Patent rights are statutory right created under the terms and conditions of the national patent l...

Read More

02
JUN
2022
Can a Reputable Mark Define Infringement?
02
JUN
2022
Recently, the Bombay High Court granted interim relief in a trademark dispute between RPG Enterprise...

Read More

22
APR
2022
The Biological Diversity (Amendment) Bill, 2021
22
APR
2022
The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 was enacted for the conservation of biological diversity, sust...

Read More

25
MAR
2022
Rules on Intellectual Property Matters Notified by High Court of Delhi
25
MAR
2022
In a much-awaited development, the Delhi High Court has notified the “High Court of Delhi Rule...

Read More

07
MAR
2022
Competitor’s Dishonest Intention in Using Similar Word Can Be Injuncted
07
MAR
2022
Recently, the Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction against the defendant until disposal of...

Read More

17
JAN
2022
Supreme Court of India Further Extended the Suspension of Limitation Period/Timelines under General and Special Laws
17
JAN
2022
In view of the spike in new cases of Covid-19, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has on...

Read More

08
DEC
2021
Non-speaking Refusal Order Quashed by the Bombay High Court
08
DEC
2021
The Bombay High Court, through an order dated 6th October 2021 in the case of Metso Outotec Corpo...

Read More

29
NOV
2021
Note on the Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021
29
NOV
2021
The Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021, will be introduc...

Read More

29
NOV
2021
Note on Joint Parliamentary Committee’s Report on the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019
29
NOV
2021
The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 was introduced in the Lower House of the Indian Parliamen...

Read More

11
OCT
2021
Delhi High Court Proposes to Frame Intellectual Property Division (IPD) Rules, 2021
11
OCT
2021
In July, 2021, the Hon’ble Chief Justice of Delhi High Court announced creation of Intellectua...

Read More

04
OCT
2021
Suspension of Limitation Period Due to COVID-19 Withdrawn
04
OCT
2021
On September 23, 2021, the Supreme Court withdrew the suspension of limitation that was in place sin...

Read More

03
AUG
2021
Surrender of a Patent Cause and Effect
03
AUG
2021
Voluntary surrender of a patent and its revocation in a court are two distinct actions through which...

Read More

13
JUL
2021
No Grant of Anti-Suit Injunction if Foreign Proceedings Not Oppressive or Vexatious: Delhi HC
13
JUL
2021
When proceedings are pending in a foreign court against an Indian citizen, such a person can requ...

Read More

16
JUN
2021
Pre-grant Order Appealable: IPAB Precedents Lost?
16
JUN
2021
Judiciously speaking precedential value of every decision of a higher court is high for deciding ...

Read More

08
APR
2021
Can a Prefix Conceal Infringement?
08
APR
2021
The factor of distinctiveness of a trademark plays a vital role in deciding infringement suits. W...

Read More

07
APR
2021
Intellectual Property Appellate Board Abolished by Way of An Ordinance
07
APR
2021
The Central Government by way of an Ordinance, namely the Tribunals Reforms (Rationalization and Con...

Read More

14
MAR
2021
Claiming Royalty Fee After Delay Cannot Be Sustained
14
MAR
2021
The High Court of Delhi in the case of Ozone Spa Pvt Ltd vs Jyotsna Sanjay Aggarwal & Anr. delibe...

Read More

12
MAR
2021
Extension of Limitation under COVID-19 Comes to an End_Supreme Court Order Dated March 8, 2021
12
MAR
2021
In view of the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, the Supreme Court of India by an order d...

Read More

07
FEB
2021
‘Knowledge Workers’ and Trade Secret!
07
FEB
2021
Knowledge drives the companies to gain competitive edge over the similarly placed companies in the m...

Read More

21
DEC
2020
Trademark Used Only for Exports Can be Protected
21
DEC
2020
Recently, the Delhi High Court heard a plea for granting an interim injunction in favour of UFO Cont...

Read More

21
DEC
2020
SMEs and Standard Essential Patents (SEPs)
21
DEC
2020
Basics of SEPs A technical standard is a formal document that establishes uniform engineering or te...

Read More

21
OCT
2020
Significant Achievements Witnessed by The IP Office (2014-15 to 2019-20)
21
OCT
2020
National IPR Policy unveiled in the year 2016 has brought out such remarkable changes in the IP. Ad...

Read More

06
AUG
2020
Indian Scenario of Electronic Health Records
06
AUG
2020
Introduction The whole world has been struggling to fight against the COVID-19 (SARS CoV-2) sinc...

Read More

16
JUL
2020
Indian Law on Software Patentability
16
JUL
2020
Software programs have become an indispensable part of the world due to the increased efficiency, ef...

Read More

  • 1
  • 2