Filter

Open

SMEs and Standard Essential Patents (SEPs)

21

DEC

2020

Basics of SEPs

A technical standard is a formal document that establishes uniform engineering or technical criteria, methods, processes, and practices that a product labelled as conforming to that standard meets. Such standards are established by what are called Standard Setting Bodies (SSBs) or Standard Development Organizations (SDOs). IEEE WLAN Standards 802.11, Bluetooth Standards, Blue Ray, and Universal Serial Bus (USB) related standards are well known examples of standards. International Electrotechnical commission (IEC), Institution of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), and International Organization for Standardization (ISO pronounced as a word derived from the Greek root "isos," meaning "equal") are some examples of well-known SSBs.

One of the purposes of standards is to ensure interoperability. That is, if there are two devices, both conforming to a given standard, let us say a USB standard, they will be able to communicate with each other seamlessly.

SSBs

SSBs create committees to develop a standard. The members of the committees are representatives of technical experts from the leading companies or institutions that have developed related technologies, technical experts such as university professors, leading researchers in the field, and so on. The committee members deliberate over the details of the standard and propose a draft that is accepted and published as a standard.

Standards and Patents

The technical requirements, protocols, and methods that needs to be met by a device conforming to a given standard may essentially make use of one or more patents. Thus, it can be imagined that if there are two patents describing different methods or means of achieving the same result, the patentees of each of them would compete to have their patented technology be included in the standard and not the other’s. Such patents as are referred to in a standard are called SEPs. The reason for this competition is that once a standard is adopted, every manufacturer of devices conforming to the standard will be required to obtain a license from a licensee for a fee. Thus, the patentee is assured of a steady income as long as the standard and the patent remain in force.

SMEs

The question arises as to what it takes to get a patent to become an SEP. Let us look at the barriers for any company, large or small to get a patent to be an SEP.

Time and Resources

Developing a standard is a long, time consuming process. Let alone small entities, it can be a burden on large entities too. Getting to be a part of the committee that is given the task of developing a standard can be a hurdle. Unless the entity has the financial strength to sustain this effort, it is improbable that its patent will become an SEP.

Looking at it in another way this long period is drain on its engineering resources that many entities cannot afford. Many large entities have people, or even departments, dedicated to this function that smaller entities cannot afford.

Skill

Even though how these committees work is known, the skill needed to negotiate with other interested parties can be a hurdle. Successful entities have years of experience in participating in this activity that they can bank on.

How can SMEs extract value?

First to Adopt

SMEs can benefit from SEPS in other ways. The greatest asset of SMEs is agility and speed to market. By adopting a standard that has been recently set, SMEs can serve and capture niche markets. These may be high margin products and services based on them though low in volume. This can be called first mover advantage because many standards take years to be adopted widely.

An essential patent not in the standard

It may also so happen that an SME might have a patent that the adopters of a standard have to per force use/infringe. In such a case, the SME can collect royalty or sell the patent to a larger entity that can do this more effectively.

It may be easier for such an SME to sell the patent as any patentee that tries to enforce a patent has to face efforts by others to invalidate the patent. And that could be a drain on the resources of the SME.

There are entities that take on the assignment of enforcing patents for smaller entities. SMEs may look at hiring such entities, instead.

Numbers

It is more difficult to enforce an individual patent than a portfolio and to start a licensing programme for one patent. Alternatively, an SME could take part in a patent pool, which may pose its own problems too.

Conclusion

While patents can afford a level playing field for small and big players in some areas, practical considerations do not allow it in some others. With the awareness gained from this overview, SMEs may use it when an opportunity arises – if need be by consulting patent professionals with experience in these matters.

About the Firm

LexOrbis
Address 709-710 Tolstoy House, 15-17 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi – 110001
Tel 91-11-2371 6565
Fax 91-11-2371 6556
Email manisha@lexorbis.com
Link www.lexorbis.com

Related Articles

22
OCT
2022
No Exclusivity over INNs – Delhi High Court Denies Injunctive Relief to Sun Pharma
22
OCT
2022
International Non-proprietary Names (INNs) are considered as generic names for pharmaceutical substa...

Read More

03
SEP
2022
Polymorphs Patentability : Looking Though Judicial Lens
03
SEP
2022
Story of exitance of polymorphism dates back to the year 1812 when Napoleon Bonaparte army wore h...

Read More

08
AUG
2022
Amendment of Product by Process Claim to a Process Complies Section 59(1)
08
AUG
2022
A recent judgement in matter of Nippon A&L Inc. V. The Controller of Patents dated 5th July 2022 ...

Read More

31
JUL
2022
Fraud in Obtaining Patent and Revocation
31
JUL
2022
Patent rights are statutory right created under the terms and conditions of the national patent l...

Read More

02
JUN
2022
Can a Reputable Mark Define Infringement?
02
JUN
2022
Recently, the Bombay High Court granted interim relief in a trademark dispute between RPG Enterprise...

Read More

22
APR
2022
The Biological Diversity (Amendment) Bill, 2021
22
APR
2022
The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 was enacted for the conservation of biological diversity, sust...

Read More

25
MAR
2022
Rules on Intellectual Property Matters Notified by High Court of Delhi
25
MAR
2022
In a much-awaited development, the Delhi High Court has notified the “High Court of Delhi Rule...

Read More

07
MAR
2022
Competitor’s Dishonest Intention in Using Similar Word Can Be Injuncted
07
MAR
2022
Recently, the Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction against the defendant until disposal of...

Read More

17
JAN
2022
Supreme Court of India Further Extended the Suspension of Limitation Period/Timelines under General and Special Laws
17
JAN
2022
In view of the spike in new cases of Covid-19, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has on...

Read More

08
DEC
2021
Non-speaking Refusal Order Quashed by the Bombay High Court
08
DEC
2021
The Bombay High Court, through an order dated 6th October 2021 in the case of Metso Outotec Corpo...

Read More

29
NOV
2021
Note on the Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021
29
NOV
2021
The Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021, will be introduc...

Read More

29
NOV
2021
Note on Joint Parliamentary Committee’s Report on the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019
29
NOV
2021
The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 was introduced in the Lower House of the Indian Parliamen...

Read More

11
OCT
2021
Delhi High Court Proposes to Frame Intellectual Property Division (IPD) Rules, 2021
11
OCT
2021
In July, 2021, the Hon’ble Chief Justice of Delhi High Court announced creation of Intellectua...

Read More

04
OCT
2021
Suspension of Limitation Period Due to COVID-19 Withdrawn
04
OCT
2021
On September 23, 2021, the Supreme Court withdrew the suspension of limitation that was in place sin...

Read More

03
AUG
2021
Surrender of a Patent Cause and Effect
03
AUG
2021
Voluntary surrender of a patent and its revocation in a court are two distinct actions through which...

Read More

13
JUL
2021
No Grant of Anti-Suit Injunction if Foreign Proceedings Not Oppressive or Vexatious: Delhi HC
13
JUL
2021
When proceedings are pending in a foreign court against an Indian citizen, such a person can requ...

Read More

16
JUN
2021
Pre-grant Order Appealable: IPAB Precedents Lost?
16
JUN
2021
Judiciously speaking precedential value of every decision of a higher court is high for deciding ...

Read More

26
MAY
2021
Court Recognizes The Seriousness of Medicinal Trademarks
26
MAY
2021
Recently, the Delhi High Court decided the case of Mankind Pharma Limited vs Novakind Bio Sciences P...

Read More

08
APR
2021
Can a Prefix Conceal Infringement?
08
APR
2021
The factor of distinctiveness of a trademark plays a vital role in deciding infringement suits. W...

Read More

07
APR
2021
Intellectual Property Appellate Board Abolished by Way of An Ordinance
07
APR
2021
The Central Government by way of an Ordinance, namely the Tribunals Reforms (Rationalization and Con...

Read More

14
MAR
2021
Claiming Royalty Fee After Delay Cannot Be Sustained
14
MAR
2021
The High Court of Delhi in the case of Ozone Spa Pvt Ltd vs Jyotsna Sanjay Aggarwal & Anr. delibe...

Read More

12
MAR
2021
Extension of Limitation under COVID-19 Comes to an End_Supreme Court Order Dated March 8, 2021
12
MAR
2021
In view of the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, the Supreme Court of India by an order d...

Read More

07
FEB
2021
‘Knowledge Workers’ and Trade Secret!
07
FEB
2021
Knowledge drives the companies to gain competitive edge over the similarly placed companies in the m...

Read More

21
DEC
2020
Trademark Used Only for Exports Can be Protected
21
DEC
2020
Recently, the Delhi High Court heard a plea for granting an interim injunction in favour of UFO Cont...

Read More

21
OCT
2020
Significant Achievements Witnessed by The IP Office (2014-15 to 2019-20)
21
OCT
2020
National IPR Policy unveiled in the year 2016 has brought out such remarkable changes in the IP. Ad...

Read More

  • 1
  • 2