Search

Region
Jurisdiction
Firm
Author
Date
to
Keywords
Search

When Trademarks Become Generic: Lessons from History

Khurana and Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys India


INTRODUCTION

Trademarks are the most commonly used identifiers for businesses: they are unique identifiers that signify the difference between products or services in trade. They stand for quality and authenticity and are part of building consumers' trust. However, some trademarks have become familiar terms in everyday use so that they lose their protected status; this phenomenon is known as "genericide" and serves as a cautionary tale for businesses seeking to protect their brand identities.

The blog also examines the outlines of genericide, mentions historical cases, and offers advice to businesses on how they could prevent their trademarks from suffering similar fates.

Introduce Genericide

Genericide occurs when a trademark becomes so closely linked to a product or service that it ceases to function as a distinctive term and therefore loses its legal protections. The term instead becomes a generic name for a whole category rather than a label for a particular brand.

For example, when consumers mention an adhesive bandage, they say "Band-Aid," and thus the term may lose its protected trademark status. This kind of thing could be a big deal for any company because it allows rivals to use it freely and hence takes away from the exclusivity of the brand.

Genericide from the Legal Point of View

Trademark laws make it mandatory for the trademarks to remain distinctive and identifiable to be able to serve as indicators for the origin of the product. They range from highly distinctive ("Google," "Apple") to inherently generic (like "milk," for example, for dairy products). Once a trademark becomes generic, it ceases to function as a brand identifier, and it loses legal protection.

In most jurisdictions, courts will determine genericity by assessing whether the relevant public regards the term as a generic name for the product rather than as a brand.

There are Genericide Cases in History.

1-Aspirin

Background: it used to be a patent of Bayer when it came to a product made of acetylsalicylic acid.

Result: Bayer's trademark rights in the U.S. were lost in the word "Aspirin" as part of war reparations in 1919-this became generic because Bayer's drug is similar to others, so it has been put into general use.

2. Escalator

Background: A name coined by Otis Elevator Company for moving stairs.

Result: Lost trademark by that nomenclature in 1950 due to abandonment and failure to evidence distinctiveness.

Lesson: It is to be seen that all such trademark rights are valued sensibly in their application concerning the maintenance of the exclusivity itself.

3. Thermos

Background: Initially held as a trademark by Thermos GmbH for vacuum-insulated bottles.

Result: By series of calls, it turned and ruled it generic by Courts again under 1963.

Lesson: With appropriate branding like the one above that ties trademarks to generic descriptors (say THERMOS® flasks), it would have avoided this problem.

4. Kleenex

Background: Trademark of Kimberly-Clark for facial tissues.

Result: So, the company thrives on vigorous legal and commercial moves to hold on to its trademark while "Kleenex" is understood as a brand name.

Lesson: Alertness and educating the consumer are effective genericide prevention weapons.

5. Xerox

Background: The company has developed a brand for photocopiers under the name Xerox Corporation. Thus, when the word "Xerox" came to be the term used by consumers to mean Xerox, the company then initialized campaigns to stress it as a brand.

Lesson: Proactive steps and public awareness campaigns will soften the severity of genericization risks.

Causes of Genericide

The causes that lead to a trademark becoming generic are as follows:

•            Overwhelming Popularity: a brand name synonymous with the product category in market dominance.

•            Lack of Enforcement: Salting remark arguably weakens the trademark distinctiveness by failing to mitigate or redress the misuse by the public or by competitors.

•            Improper Usage: An inadvertent promotion of genericization is the use of the trademark as a generic term in advertising or within a branding program.

•            Public Perception: In fact, in most cases, genericide always takes place in the way the general public uses a term.

Effects of Genericide Losing a trademark to genericism can cause dire effects on a business

•            Loss of Exclusivity: Other competitors will concomitantly use the term which would cause dilution of the brand uniqueness.

•            Revenue Impact: More competition will lead to price deduction which thus causes a decrease in profitability.

•            Weakened Brand Equity: The worth and reputation associated with the trademark might erode.

Strategies to Stop Genericization Generic acquisitions are things that a business can do to gain some preventive, proactive measures to guard the trademarks:

1.           Consumer Education

Inform the public and consumers through advertisements about the trademark as a trademark, not a generic name: such as Kimberly-Clark's campaigns mentioning "Kleenex® brand tissues."

2.           Active Monitoring and Enforcement

Regularly track how the trademark is used in the market and address cases of misuse through legal actions such as cease and desist letters.

3.           Correct Use

Use trademarks as adjectives (for example, 'Xerox photocopier'), not as nouns or verbs, and always couple the mark with the ™ or ® symbol to stand behind its status.

4.           Combine with a Generic Descriptor

Pair with a descriptive term to clarify its brand nature i.e. "Band-Aid® adhesive bandages" or "Google search engine."

5.        Internal Training

Properly ingraining into employees, particularly in marketing and sales departments, the right use of the trademark to avoid unintentional genericization of those trademarks.

6.      Defend Intellectual Property

Enforce the law whenever necessary to protect the use of your trademark by others. Consistent enforcement shows credibility to the legitimacy to protect the brand identity against competitors or others.

Conclusion

The trend in history about trademarks turning into a generic captures the business-that-best-wakes-most-caution story, which is ever critical and central, especially in brand vigilance. The process by which a trademark comes to be so widely used that it loses its legal protection is known as genericide, which usually results in to failure to act or lack of strategic direction at the appropriate time. Some of the most famous names have been referred to genericity. Take, for example, "Aspirin" or "Escalator." These fell to genericity through inaction and, as a result, exclusive use was lost along with the coverage of their important assets that were intellectual.

Still, very much, many organizations would boast of successfully guarding their trademarks through proactive actions like others, and Xerox, for instance, created very extensive public awareness activities on proper usage of the trademarks to avoid confusing individuals into believing that products or services are synonymous with the brand. Such efforts hark back to the scope of consistent education, monitoring, and enforcement in the trademark safeguard process.

The risk associated with genericide is one that businesses do indeed need to understand since they want to keep their trademarks unique and valuable. Using such strategies as requiring proper usage in their marketing materials, monitoring third-party uses, and using the trademark with generic terms (such as: "Kleenex tissues") could further limit the chances of dilution. Legal action in misuse, whenever necessary, would also show a commitment toward brand integrity.

Genericide comes, but not as a consequence of popularity. Businesses can effectively work, through careful planning, attentive monitoring, and quick action, to deny a trademark status of genericity. "Prevention is better than cure," and nowhere does this adage hold truer than in the realm of intellectual property. By taking proactive measures, companies keep their trademark's valuable assets in the recognition and legal foundation they will enjoy going forward.

References-

https://www.mindingyourbusinesslitigation.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/53/2018/02/biplj223.pdf

https://www.ipthink-tank.com/post/what-is-trademark-genericide-and-how-to-avoid-it

https://www.mondaq.com/india/trademark/1194548/lost-in-the-crowd-the-life-of-generic-trademarks

https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/copyright-law/can-generic-trademarks-be-protected.php

Khurana and Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys



About the Firm

Khurana and Khurana, Advocates and IP Attorneys

AddressD-45, UPSIDC, Site IV, Kasna Road, Greater Noida - 201308, National Capital Region, India
Tel91-120-313 2513, 91-120-350 5740
Fax91-120-4516201
Contact PersonTarun Khurana
Emailinfo@khuranaandkhurana.com
Linkwww.khuranaandkhurana.com


Related Articles