Filter

Open

02

JUL

2021

Newsletter (No.12) June, 2021

This Newsletter summarizes legal information updated in the latest one month.

*PATENT

PATENT ★★”PIT CONSTRUCTING MACHINE” Case: A case in which the IP High Court found that (i) since the purposes of a primary cited invention and a secondary cited invention are different, the structure of the primary cited invention needs to be changed correspondingly to the difference in the purposes in order to be combined with the secondary cited invention (there is a factor teaching away from combining the secondary cited invention with the primary cited invention), and (ii) a part of a structure of a cited invention is not allowed to be extracted independently (the limitations of specifying technical contents as generic concepts). The Court acknowledged an inventive step of the Present Invention.

---IP High Court Case No. 2019 (Gyo-ke) 10102 of May 24, 2020 (Presiding Judge TAKABE)---

PATENT ★★”Topical Ophthalmic Formulation for Treating Allergic Eye Diseases” Case: A case in which the IP High Court, to which the case was remanded by the Supreme Court, found that an inventive step was acknowledged because the Present Invention has an unpredictable and remarkable effect, although the previous lawsuit judgment which determined that the different feature (the use) in the Present Invention would have been easily conceivable became final and binding.

---IP High Court Case No. 2019 (Gyo-ke) 10118 of June 17, 2020 (Presiding Judge MORI) ---

*TRADEMARK

Trademark Act A case in which the Court revoked a decision of the Japan Patent Office which refused an application for registration of the trademark “空調服”, consisting of common Japanese characters, which designates Class 25, “working clothes, shirts and blouson having ventilation function” as its designated goods, by finding that the trademark in question corresponds to a “mark consisting solely of a mark indicating, in a common manner, the quality…of goods” set forth in Article 3, Paragraph 1, Item 3 of the Trademark Act; however, the trademark in question corresponds to a “trademark by which, as a result of the use thereof, consumers are able to recognize the goods…as those pertaining to a business of a particular person” set forth in Article 3, Paragraph 2 of the same Act.

---The Intellectual Property High Court Decision of February 25, 2021 (Case No. 2020 [Gyo-Ke] 10084―Presiding Judge MORI)---

TrademarkA case in which, with respect to the use of a trademark consisting of the characters, “農口”, written vertically in cursive style or in block style, for the designated goods of “Japanese sake” by Noguchi Shuzo Co., Ltd. [農口酒造株式会社] (formerly Yamamoto Shuzo Honten K.K. [山本酒造本店株式会社]) (the “Defendant”) who is the right holder of the trademark consisting of the characters, “農口”, written in standard characters, the Court affirmed the Japan Patent Office’s decision which dismissed a request for a trial for rescission of the Defendant’s trademark registration filed by 農口尚彦 [Naohiko Noguchi], the Plaintiff, who has strong name recognition among Japanese sake enthusiasts and worked for the Defendant as chief sake brewer, based on a cited trademark consisting of the characters, “農口尚彦研究所”, written vertically in block style, denying the applicability of Article 51, Paragraph 1 of the Trademark Act which stipulates to the effect that where a trademark right holder intentionally uses a trademark similar to a registered trademark in a manner that causes confusion as to the source of or misleads as to the quality of the goods or services, the trademark registration may be cancelled.

---The Intellectual Property High Court Decision of December 23, 2020 (Case No. 2020 [Gyo-Ke] 10050―Presiding Judge OTAKA)---

Hideki Takaishi (Attorney at Law & Patent Attorney) (Publishing Manager)

Nakamura & Partners

Room No. 616, Shin-Tokyo Building, 3-3-1 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku,

E-mail: nakamura_and_partners---magazine@nakapat.gr.jp

*The content of this newsletter provides general information and is not legal advice.

*Nakamura & Partners was founded in 1914 and provides comprehensive IP-related services both domestically and internationally as an international IP law firm.

Related Newsletters

14
JUN
2021
14
JUN
2021
Newsletter (No.11) June, 2021 This Newsletter summarizes legal information updated in the latest...

Read More

11
MAY
2021
11
MAY
2021
Newsletter (No.10) May, 2021 We are now introducing practical legal information on our homepage ...

Read More

08
APR
2021
08
APR
2021
Newsletter (No.9) April 2021 We are now introducing practical legal information on our homepage ...

Read More

03
MAR
2021
03
MAR
2021
Newsletter (No.8) March, 2021 We hope this message finds you well. We are now introducing pract...

Read More

08
FEB
2021
08
FEB
2021
Newsletter (No.7) February 2021 We hope this message finds you well. We are now introducing pra...

Read More

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3