Filter

Open

18

JUN

2021

业界新闻:

中国首个国际商标信息官方查询系统上线运行

China's First Official International Trademark Information Inquiry System Went Live

426日,中国国家知识产权局在新闻发布会上介绍了欧盟商标查询系统上线运行有关信息。该系统为中国首个国际商标信息官方查询系统。

该系统可以为社会公众和创新创业主体提供快速、便捷、全面的欧盟商标信息查询服务,系统的上线运行填补了海外商标查询工具的空白。

2020925日,国家知识产权局与欧盟知识产权局签订中欧商标信息交换协议,首次实现了我国商标数据国际交换合作。截至20213月底,欧盟知识产权局共向中国国家知识产权局提供商标数据约194.7万件,数据包括商标基本信息、商品与服务信息、优先权信息、分类信息、流程信息等内容。

(来源:中国国家知识产权局网站)

The China National Intellectual Property Administration of China (CNIPA) introduced the launch and operation of the EU trademark inquiry system at the press conference on April 26. The system is China's first official international trademark information inquiry system.

The system can provide the public and innovative and entrepreneurial entities with fast, convenient, and comprehensive EU trademark information inquiry services. The launch and operation of the system fills in gaps in overseas trademark inquiry tools.

On September 25, 2020, the CNIPA and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) signed a China-EU Trademark Information Exchange Agreement, realizing for the first time China's trademark data exchange and cooperation with other countries. As of the end of March 2021, the EUIPO has provided about 1.947 million pieces of trademark information to the CNIPA, including contents such as trademark basic information, information on goods and services, priority information, classification information, and process information.

(Source: CNIPA website)

2020年中国知识产权保护状况白皮书发布

White Paper: Intellectual Property Protection in China in 2020

425日,中国国家知识产权局发布了《二〇二〇年中国知识产权保护状况》白皮书。从多个方面总结了2020年中国知识产权保护实践做法、进展情况及知识产权保护工作成效。

On April 25, the CNIPA issued the White Paper: Intellectual Property Protection in China in 2020, in which the practice, progress and results of intellectual property protection in China in 2020 were summarized from many aspects.

在保护成效方面。2020年中国知识产权保护成效得到各国创新主体和国际社会广泛认可。知识产权保护社会满意度创新高,达到80.05分(百分制)。世界知识产权组织发布的2020年全球创新指数报告显示,中国排名第14位。

In terms of protection results, China's results of intellectual property protection in 2020 were widely acknowledged by innovative entities in various countries and the international community. Social satisfaction on intellectual property protection set a new record, reaching 80.05 points (percentage system). According to the 2020 Global Innovation Index Report released by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), China ranked 14th.

在制度建设方面。2020年,中国修改出台知识产权相关法律法规4部;发布知识产权保护相关司法解释6个;出台实施知识产权保护相关政策文件20余个;发布知识产权保护相关国家标准2个。

In terms of system construction, in 2020, China revised and unveiled 4 laws and regulations related to intellectual property rights, issued 6 judicial interpretations related to intellectual property protection, promulgated more than 20 papers concerning implementation of policies related to intellectual property protection, and published 2 national standards related to intellectual property protection.

在审批登记方面。白皮书指出,各类知识产权审批登记数量持续增长,审查质量与效率显著提高。2020年,中国发明专利授权53万件,每万人口发明专利拥有量达到15.8件。商标注册量576.1万件,国内申请人提交马德里商标国际注册申请7553件,在马德里联盟中排名第三。著作权登记总量为503.9万件。高价值专利审查周期压减至14个月,商标注册平均审查周期压减至4个月。

In terms of approval and registration, the white paper pointed out that the number of all kinds of intellectual property approvals and registrations has increased continuously, and the examination quality and efficiency have been significantly enhanced. In 2020, 530,000 patents for invention were granted in China, and the number of patents for invention per 10,000 people reached 15.8. The number of trademark registrations was 5.761 million, and domestic applicants filed 7,553 applications under the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks, ranking third in the Madrid Union. The total number of copyright registrations was 5.039 million. The examination period for high value patents was reduced to 14 months, and the average examination period for trademark registration was reduced to 4 months.

在国际合作方面。白皮书指出,2020年,中国继续深化与世界知识产权组织等国际组织以及各国各地区知识产权机构的交流合作。视听表演北京条约生效,区域全面经济伙伴关系协定、中欧地理标志保护与合作协定正式签署,推动全球知识产权治理体制向着更加公正合理的方向发展。

In terms of international cooperation, the white paper pointed out that in 2020, China continued to deepen exchanges and cooperation with international organizations such as the WIPO and intellectual property institutions in various countries and regions. The Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances entered into force, and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement and the China-EU Geographical Indications Protection and Cooperation Agreement were officially signed, promoting the development of the global intellectual property governance system in a more equitable and rational direction.

中国于1994年发布第一份知识产权保护状况白皮书,自1998年起,按年度编制发布,至今已20余年。

China released the first white paper on intellectual property protection in 1994. The white papers on intellectual property protection have been compiled and released annually for more than 20 years since 1998.

(来源:国家知识产权局政务微信)

(Source: CHINA Official WeChat Account)

中国在一带一路沿线国家专利申请授权实现双增长

China's Patent Applications and Authorizations in Countries along "the Belt and Road" Route Increased

专利申请公开量6198件,专利授权量4245……据悉,2020年,中国在一带一路沿线国家专利申请、专利授权方面实现双增长。

The number of published patent applications was 6,198, and the number of authorized patents was 4,245 . It is reported that the number of China's patent applications and issuances in countries along "the Belt and Road" route increased in 2020.

数据显示,2020年中国在一带一路沿线国家专利申请公开量同比增长17.1%,共进入一带一路沿线22个国家。中国在韩国申请公开量为3395件,位居所有申请目的国之首,新加坡、越南、菲律宾、南非分别位列第二名至第五名。2020年,中国在一带一路沿线国家专利授权量同比增长19.3%,涉及26个沿线国家。

Data shows that in 2020, China's patent applications were filed in 22 countries along "the Belt and Road" route, and the number of published patent applications increased by 17.1% year-on-year. China obtained 3,395 published patent applications in South Korea, ranking first in all application destination countries. Singapore, Vietnam, Philippines, and South Africa ranked second to fifth, respectively. In 2020, the number of issued patents of China in countries along "the Belt and Road" route increased by 19.3% year-on-year, and 26 countries along the route were involved.

2020年,中国在一带一路沿线国家的专利申请与专利授权均实现技术领域全覆盖。数字通信位居中国在一带一路沿线国家专利申请技术领域之首,申请公开量为1435件,占比23.2%;该领域同时以455件专利授权量居中国在一带一路沿线国家专利授权技术领域之首,同比增长38.7%。计算机技术和电气机械设备及电能居专利申请、专利授权技术领域的第二位和第三位。

In 2020, China's patent applications and authorizations in countries along "the Belt and Road" route cover all technical fields. The number of published applications in the field of digital communication was 1,435 and accounted for 23.2%, making digital communication rank first in the technical fields of patent applications of China in countries along "the Belt and Road" route. Meanwhile, the number of issued patents in the field was 455, making the field rank first in the technical fields of the issued patents of China in countries along the "Belt and Road" route and achieving a year-on-year increase of 38.7%. Computer technology and electrical equipment of machines & electrical energy ranked second and third respectively in the technical fields in the aspects of patent application and patent authorization.

数据显示,一带一路沿线国家加大在华专利布局力度。2020一带一路沿线共有74个国家在华提交专利申请,其中提交发明专利申请2.3万件,同比增长3.9%,高于国外来华发明专利申请同比增速。2020一带一路沿线共有71个国家在华获得1.3万件发明专利授权。

Data shows that countries along "the Belt and Road" route have enhanced their patent layout in China. In 2020, 74 countries along "the Belt and Road" route filed patent applications in China. The number of applications of patent for invention was 23,000, achieving a year-on-year increase of 3.9%, which is higher than the year-on-year growth rate of foreign applications of patent for invention in China. In 2020, 71 countries along "the Belt and Road" route obtained 13,000 issued patents for invention in China.

(来源:中国知识产权报)

(Source: China Intellectual Property News)

经典案例:

宝利通诉小鱼易连侵害视频会议软件著作权案

Polycom vs. XYLink Copyright Infringement Litigation Concerning Video Conferencing Software

案情回顾:

案号:(2017)京73民初1249

原告:宝利通公司

被告:北京小鱼在家科技有限公司

北京小鱼易连科技有限公司

北京澹泊兄弟计算机科技有限公司

案由:侵害计算机软件著作权纠纷

要点:视频会议领域计算机软件侵权判定规则

Case summary:

Case number: (2017) Jing 73 Min Chu No. 1249

Plaintiff: Polycom, Inc.

Defendants: Beijing Xiaoyuzaijia Science and Technology Co., Ltd.

Beijing XYLink Science and Technology Co., Ltd.

Beijing Danbo Brothers Computer Technology Co., Ltd.

Cause of action: dispute over copyright infringement concerning computer software

Key point: rules of infringement determination for computer software in the field of videoconferencing

本案原告宝利通公司于2015年发现其视频会议软件的著作权被涉案企业侵犯后,与集佳进行沟通,计划提起诉讼进行维权。集佳团队在宝利通的授权委托下进行了周密的调查和推进。20177月该案正式在北京知识产权法院立案,历经十余次听证、谈话、开庭后,北知院于20207月作出一审判决。被告不服一审判决,上诉到最高人民法院。在最高人民法院于202012月组织二审庭询后,被告撤回上诉,最高人民法院于20211月裁定准许该撤诉,一审判决由此生效。本案历经近6年时间,仅诉讼程序就持续了近4年,终获案件胜诉,成功地维护了客户的合法权利。

The plaintiff, Polycom, Inc., discovered in 2015 that the copyright of its video conferencing software was infringed by the companies concerned, and then communicated with Unitalen and planned to file a lawsuit to protect its rights. The Unitalen team conducted a thorough investigation and pushed forward the work with authorization given by Polycom. The case was placed on file in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court in July 2017. After more than ten hearings and talks, the court opened a court session and made the first-instance judgment in July 2020. The defendants were not satisfied with the judgment and appealed to the Supreme People's Court. After the second-instance interrogation by the Supreme People's Court in December 2020, the defendants withdrew the appeal. The Supreme People's Court ruled that the withdrawal of the appeal was allowed in January 2021, and thus the first-instance judgment came into force. This case lasted for nearly 6 years, and the legal proceedings alone lasted for nearly 4 years. Our client Polycom finally won the case and successfully protected its legitimate rights.

裁判要旨:

1.在原告提交的源代码与目标代码所反映的作品范围不一致,且源代码的完成时间无法确认时,应以能够确定完成时间的目标代码或与上述目标代码具有同一性且编译后实际进入该目标代码的源代码作为实质性相似判断中的原告作品基础。

2.在被告拒不提交或未准确提交被诉侵权的计算机软件源代码时,推定原、被告的软件构成实质性相似通常应满足一定前提条件,即原告能够举证证明二者目标代码相同或者相近似,或被诉侵权的计算机软件目标代码存在原告主张权利的计算机软件特有内容,或者在软件结果等方面相同或者实质性相似。

3.实质性相似部分所占比例的大小并不影响行为定性,仅仅是后续认定侵权情节的考量因素。

Abbreviature of adjudication:

1. In the case where the source code and the object code submitted by the plaintiff reflected inconsistent work scopes and the completion time for the source code could not be determined, the object code for which the completion time can be determined or the source code that is identical to the above object code and actually enters the object code after being compiled should serve as the basis of the plaintiff's work in the determination of substantial similarity.

2. In the case where the defendants refused to submit or failed to accurately submit the source code of the alleged infringing computer software, the presumption that the software of the plaintiff and the software of the defendants are substantially similar should usually be made based on a precondition, that is, the plaintiff can prove that the object codes of the two are identical or similar, or the object code of the alleged infringing computer software includes specific content of the computer software claimed by the plaintiff, or the two are identical or substantially similar in terms of software results or the like.

3. The proportion of substantially similar parts does not affect the determination of nature of the behavior but is merely a consideration for the subsequent determination of infringement severity.

典型意义:

本案主要当事人均为视频会议领域的知名企业,涉及权利人的多个软件作品和被告的多款被诉侵权软件。尽管双方作品构成实质性相似的比例较低,但不会影响侵权成立的定性。法院在综合考虑在案证据的基础上,依照法定赔偿上限确定了赔偿金额。本案判决对相关问题的分析为此类疑难复杂案件的审理积累了经验,并在第21个世界知识产权日期间入选北京知识产权法院十大科技创新典型案例。

Significance

The parties in this case are all well-known enterprises in the field of video conferencing, and multiple software works of the right holder and multiple alleged infringing software of the defendants were involved. Although the proportion of substantially similar parts in the works of both parties was low, the determination of the existence of infringement was not affected. The court determined the amount of compensation in accordance with the statutory upper limit on the basis of comprehensive consideration of the evidence in the case. The analysis of relevant issues in the judgment of this case can provide experience for the trial of such difficult and complex cases, and this case was selected as one of the top ten typical science and technology innovation cases of Beijing Intellectual Property Court on the 21st World Intellectual Property Day.

润滑油和三轮车跨类认定类似,12年注册商标最高院再审终被宣告无效!

The Cross-Class Similarity Determination of Trademarks for Lubricating Oil and Motorcycles Finally Leads to the Invalidation of 12-Year Registered Trademark by the Supreme Court in the Retrial!

基本案情:

淮安市海润石化有限公司于200566日在第4类的工业用油;发动机油;乳化油;白油;溶剂油;润滑油;燃料油等商品上申请注册诉争商标,并于20081114日获准注册。

Case Summary:

Huai'an Hairun Petrochemical Co. Ltd. (Hairun Company) applied for registration of the disputed trademark on goods "Industrial oil; Motor oil; Emulsifying oil; White oil; Solvent oil; Lubricating oil; and Fuel oil" and the like in Class 4, on June 6, 2005, and was approved on November 14, 2008.

淮海控股集团有限公司引证其在先注册在第12电动自行车、电动三轮车、摩托车商品上的第4489518淮海HUAIHAI及图商标与第12三轮车商品上的第313958淮海HUAIHAI江苏徐州及图商标对诉争商标提起无效宣告申请。

Huaihai Holding Group Co. Ltd. (Huaihai Company) cited its prior trademark No. 4489518 "淮海HUAIHAI and device" registered on goods "Electric bicycles, Electric tricycles, Motorcycles" in Class 12 and trademark No. 313958 "淮海HUAIHAI江苏徐州 (JIANGSU XUZHOU) and device" on goods "Motorcycles" in Class 12 and filed an invalidation application of the disputed trademark.

经原商标评审委员会审查,诉争商标与引证商标构成使用在同一种或类似商品上的近似商标,因此裁定对诉争商标予以无效宣告。海润公司不服该裁定,向北京知识产权法院提起行政诉讼,要求撤销被诉裁定。北京知识产权法院经审理后,认为虽然诉争商标由文字淮海构成,完整包含于二引证商标,构成近似商标,但诉争商标核定使用的工业用油;润滑油等商品与引证商标核定使用的商品在功能、用途、销售渠道、消费群体方面差别较大,不构成类似商品。一审判决,撤销被诉裁定,维持诉争商标有效。淮海公司向北京市高级人民法院提起上诉,此后二审法院判决维持原判。

Upon examination, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (the TRAB) determined that the disputed trademark constitutes confusingly similar trademark to the cited trademark which were used on the same or similar goods. Thus, the disputed trademark was ruled to be invalid. Hairun Company was dissatisfied with the decision and filed an administrative litigation with the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, the court of first instance, requesting to revoke the TRAB’s decision. After examination, the Court announced that although the disputed trademark was composed of the character "淮海", which was completely contained in the two cited trademarks and constituted a similar trademark, the goods "Industrial oil; and Lubricating oil" and the like approved for use by the disputed trademark and the goods approved for use by the cited trademark had great distinctions in function, use, marketing channel and consumer group, and they did not constitute similar goods. The judgment of the first instance revoked the TRAB’s decision and maintained the disputed trademark. Huaihai Company appealed to the Beijing High People's Court, the court of second instance, but the court decided to uphold the judgment of the court of first instance.

淮海公司不服二审判决,向最高人民法院申请再审,并委托集佳律所代理其参加再审诉讼。集佳律师通过搜集相关证据和论述最终被最高法院采纳。

Huaihai Company refused to accept the second-instance judgment and appealed to the Supreme People's Court for a retrial, and entrusted Unitalen to participate in the retrial proceedings on its behalf. Unitalen lawyers collected the relevant evidence and made arguments, which were finally adopted by the Supreme Court.

法院判决:

一审、二审法院均认为诉争商标指定的第4类润滑油、发动机油与淮海公司的二件引证商标指定的第12类三轮车、摩托车等商品未构成类似商品,因此不违反原商标法28条。最高法院经审理后认为,润滑油、发动机油是三轮车、摩托车的备品配件,经常在摩配市场或汽车修理厂销售,两者具有一定联系,认定为类似商品,判决撤销一审、二审判决,原商评委作出的对诉争商标予以无效宣告的裁定得以维持。

The Supreme Court Judgment

Both the courts of the first and second instances held that the lubricating oil and motor oil in Class 4 designated by the disputed trademark and the goods such as tricycles, and motorcycles in Class 12 designated by the two cited trademarks of Huaihai Company did not constitute similar goods, which did not violate Article 28 of the original Trademark Law. After the trial, the Supreme Court held that lubricating oil and motor oil are spare parts for tricycles and motorcycles, often sold in motorcycle parts markets or garages. The two were connected to a certain degree and determined as similar goods. The judgments of the first and second instances were revoked, and the original TRAB's ruling to invalidate the disputed trademark was upheld.

典型意义:

该案再审判决明确了判断诉争商标与引证商标是否构成类似商品上的近似商标、以及是否容易造成相关公众混淆误认时,除了一般应考虑的商标标识的近似程度、商品类似程度以外,还应当考虑引证商标的显著性和知名度、诉争商标申请人的主观意图等因素。其中关于商品类似程度,即便相关商品属于《类似商品和服务区分表》中不同类别的商品,如具有搭配使用的关系,在功能、用途、消费群体、销售渠道等方面具有高度关联,也应当认为属于类似商品。同时,该案再审判决关于稳定市场秩序抗辩的相关评述,对于类似案件具有参考意义。

Typical Significance:

The retrial judgment in this case clarified that when determining whether the disputed trademark and the cited trademark constitute similar trademarks on similar goods, and whether it is likely to cause confusion and misunderstanding by the relevant public, in addition to the similarity degree of the trademark logo and the similarity degree of the goods, factors such as the distinctiveness and popularity of the cited trademark, as well as the subjective intention of the applicant for the disputed trademark should also be considered. Regarding the similarity degree of goods, even if the related goods belong to different classes in the Table for Differentiating Similar Goods and Service, they shall be determined as similar goods if they are used by collocation and are highly related in terms of function, use, consumer group, and marketing channels, etc. In the meantime, the relevant comments on the defense of stabilizing the market order in the retrial judgment are of reference significance for similar cases.

集佳新闻:

集佳受邀成为中国医学装备知识产权联盟副理事长单位

Unitalen Was Invited to be the Vice Chairman Enterprise of

China Medical Equipment Intellectual Property Alliance

2021410日,中国医学装备知识产权联盟成立会暨中国医学装备知识产权发展论坛在北京成功召开。北京集佳知识产权代理有限公司受邀成为联盟第一届理事会副理事长单位,集佳知识产权顾问曹冬梅当选联盟第一届理事会副理事长。

On April 10, 2021, the founding meeting of China Medical Equipment Intellectual Property Alliance and China Medical Equipment Intellectual Property Development Forum was successfully held in Beijing. Unitalen invited to become the vice chairman enterprise of the first council of the Alliance, and Unitalen IP consultant Cao Dongmei was elected vice chairman of the first council of the Alliance.

2020年度集佳律师事务所十大知识产权典型案例

Unitalen Top 10 IP Cases of 2020

在世界知识产权日来临之际,集佳律所从代理的众多知识产权案件中筛选出2020年度具有代表性的专利案件与商标案件各5件,与各界同仁分享。

On the occasion of World IP Day, here we have selected ten representative cases from the numerous patent and trademark cases of Unitalen and share them with peers from all circles.

专利篇

TOP1曹桂兰等与重庆力帆汽车销售公司、重庆力帆乘用车有限公司等鲨鱼鳍式天线发明专利侵权纠纷再审案

TOP2统一企业(中国)有限公司与谢小平有关杯子(牛奶杯)确认不侵害外观设计专利权纠纷再审案

TOP3搜狗公司无效百度公司触控操作发明专利权无效案

TOP4 M-I有限公司与河北某公司专利无效案

TOP5老板电器与国家知识产权局、某公司关于抽油烟机发明专利无效行政诉讼案

Patent Cases

TOP 1 Retrial of infringement dispute over invention patent "Shark Fin Antenna" between Cao Guilan et al. and Chongqing Lifan Automobile Sales Co., Ltd., and Chongqing Lifan Passenger Vehicle Co., Ltd. et al.

TOP 2 Retrial of dispute over determination of non-infringement of patent right of design "Cup (milk cup)" between Uni-President (China) Co., Ltd. and Xie Xiaoping

TOP 3 Case of Sougou, Inc. invalidating the patent for invention "Touch Operation" of Baidu, Inc.

TOP 4 Patent invalidation between M-I Co., Ltd. and a certain company in Hebei

TOP 5 Administrative litigation concerning the invalidation of the invention patent for a kitchen ventilator between Robam Appliances and CNIPA and a certain company

商标篇

TOP1泰诺健商标假冒案件在南通的行政查处(江苏省十大执法案件)

TOP2湖南富丽真金家纺公司、湖南富丽真金家具公司关于富丽真金及图商标无效宣告行政诉讼再审案

TOP3法拉力公司与长沙法拉力酒业、长沙恩佐酒业、冷君等关于法拉利商标侵权案

TOP4腾讯公司微信支付文字使用行为确认不侵权二审案

TOP5法国拉菲罗斯柴尔德酒庄与法国拉菲民营酒庄LAFITTE系列商标无效案

Trademark Cases

Top 1 Administrative investigation and handling of Technogym trademark counterfeiting case in Nantong (One of Top Ten Law Enforcement Cases in Jiangsu Province)

TOP 2 Retrial of administrative litigation on invalidation of trademark "富丽真金 and device" between Hunan Fullrich (Chinese name as "富丽真金") Textiles Company and Hunan Fu-li-Zhen-Jin (Chinese name as "富丽真金") Furniture Co., Ltd.

TOP 3 Trademark infringement regarding "Ferrari" between Ferrari and Changsha Falali Wine Trading Co., Ltd, Changsha Enzuo Wine Commercial House, and Leng Jun, etc.

TOP 4 Second-instance trial for the determination of non-infringement of using the characters of "微信支付(WeChat Pay)" by Tencent

TOP 5 Trademark invalidation on LAFITTE series trademarks between CHATEAU LAFITE ROTHSCHILD and SCEA CHATEAU LAFITTE

集佳上海分所与上海大学法学院/知识产权学院签署知识产权教学研究实践基地合作协议

Unitalen Shanghai Branch Signed a Cooperation Agreement on "IP Teaching and Research Practice Base" with Shanghai University Law School/IP School

2021421日,上海大学法学院/知识产权学院与北京市集佳律师事务所上海分所知识产权教学研究实践基地签约揭牌仪式在集佳上海分所举行。

仪式上,上海大学法学院/知识产权学院副院长袁真富与骆苏华律师代表双方签署了上海大学法学院/知识产权学院与北京市集佳律师事务所上海分所战略合作协议,并由袁真富副院长与钱芳律师一同为上海大学知识产权教学研究实践基地揭牌。

On April 21, 2021, the signing and unveiling ceremony of the "IP Teaching and Research Practice Base" between Shanghai University Law School/IP School and Unitalen Attorneys at Law Shanghai Branch was held in Unitalen Shanghai Branch.

At the ceremony, Yuan Zhenfu, Deputy Dean of the Shanghai University Law School/IP School, and lawyer Luo Suhua, signed a strategic cooperation agreement between the parties. The Deputy Dean and lawyer Qian Fang inaugurated the "Shanghai University IP Teaching and Research Practice Base".

中关村知识产权保护中心走进集佳

Zhongguancun IP Protection Center Visited Unitalen

2021422日,中关村知识产权保护中心新材料产业预审服务部部长张慧明一行莅临集佳交流走访,集佳合伙人、顾问部部长朱国栋,国内流程部部长李露等参与座谈。

张慧明部长对保护中心专利预审的时限优势、申请流程、材料要点以及常见的问题做了详细的介绍和讲解,同时,针对集佳业务人员提出的相关问题给予了解答,双方围绕如何用好专利快速预审通道等问题进行了深入交流。

On April 22, 2021, Zhang Huiming, Director of the New Material Industry Pre-Prosecution Service Department of Zhongguancun IP Protection Center, and his group, visited Unitalen. Unitalen partner and Director of Consultant Department, Zhu Guodong, together with Director of Domestic Process Department, Li Lu, and others participated in the discussion.

Director Zhang Huiming gave a detailed introduction and explanation of the time limit advantages, application process, key points of invention materials, and common problems of the Protection Center's patent pre-prosecution. At the same time, he gave answers to related questions raised by Unitalen's business staff. Both parties have conducted in-depth exchanges on issues such as how to make good use of the rapid patent pre-prosecution channel.

2021“5·10中国品牌日北京商标品牌发展论坛成功举办

2021 "5·10 China Brand Day" Beijing Trademark Brand Development Forum Was Successfully Held

202158日,由北京市知识产权局主办、北京商标协会承办的2021“5·10中国品牌日北京商标品牌发展论坛在京举行。

北京商标协会执行副秘书长、集佳合伙人赵雷宣布北京老字号企业商标监测预警平台上线启动。该平台为北京商标协会联合北京老字号协会,将对北京老字号企业给予点对点的支持与服务,推动老字号焕发新活力。

On May 8, 2021, the 2021 "5·10 China Brand Day" Beijing Trademark Brand Development Forum, hosted by the Beijing Intellectual Property Office and undertaken by the Beijing Trademark Association was held in Beijing.

Zhao Lei, Executive Deputy Secretary-General of Beijing Trademark Association and partner of Unitalen, announced the online launch of the "Beijing Time-honored Enterprise Trademark Monitoring and Early Warning Platform", through which the Beijing Trademark Association and the Beijing Time-honored Brands Association will jointly provide point-to-point support and services to Beijing time-honored enterprises to promote the revitalization of those time-honored brands.

北京商标协会会长、集佳合伙人会议主席于泽辉介绍了北京商标协会在助力北京企业品牌战略方面发挥的重要作用。协会将通过为企业培养商标管理人才、宣传推介北京品牌、定期在北京举办国际商标论坛等举措,把北京品牌推向世界。

Yu Zehui, President of Beijing Trademark Association and Chairman of Unitalen Partners Conference, introduced the important role that the Beijing Trademark Association plays in assisting Beijing's enterprise brands strategy. The association will promote the Beijing brands to the world by cultivating trademark management talents for enterprises, promoting Beijing brands, and regularly holding international trademark forums in Beijing.

集佳合伙人张亚洲律师围绕利用驰名商标制度为知名品牌保驾护航这一主题,分析了与驰名商标有关的商标侵权案件占比逐渐增多的现状及成因,对近年有影响力的驰名商标保护案件进行了详细解读,并提出了针对驰名商标的保护建议。

Focusing on the theme of "Using the Well-known Trademark System to Protect Well-known Brands", Unitalen partner and lawyer Zhang Yazhou analyzed the status and causes of the increasing proportion of trademark infringement cases related to well-known trademarks, made a detailed interpretation of influential cases of well-known trademark protection in recent years, and further put forward advice on the protection of well-known trademarks.

论坛上,多位知名业内专家围绕中国品牌商标战略聚力双循环、引领新消费等议题做了主题演讲,并就新格局下品牌崛起之道提出了有价值的意见和建议,与会嘉宾反响积极热烈,论坛圆满成功。

At the forum, several well-known experts in the field gave speeches on topics such as "China Brand Trademark Strategy" and "Focusing on Dual Circulation, Leading New Consumption", and put forward valuable opinions and suggestions on the ways brands rise under the new social pattern. The participants responded positively and enthusiastically, and the forum was a complete success.

About the Firm

Unitalen Attorneys at Law
Address 7th Floor, Scitech Place, No. 22 Jian Guo Men Wai Ave., Beijing, 100004 P. R. China
Tel 86-10-5920 8888
Fax 86-10-5920 8588
Email mail@unitalen.com
Link www.unitalen.com

Related Newsletters

18
JUN
2021
18
JUN
2021
業界ニュース: 中国初の国際商標情報公式検索システムが運用開始 4...

Read More

28
APR
2021
28
APR
2021
业界新闻: 世界知识产权组织:2020年国际专利申请量仍实现增长 WIPO: PCT I...

Read More

28
APR
2021
28
APR
2021
業界ニュース: 世界知的所有権機関:2020年の国際特許の出願件数は依然...

Read More

22
MAR
2021
22
MAR
2021
业界新闻: 战略性新兴产业分类与国际专利分类参照关系表首次发布 CNIPA:...

Read More

22
MAR
2021
22
MAR
2021
業界ニュース: 戦略的新興産業分類と国際特許分類の対照表を初公表 こ...

Read More

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6