Filter

Open

Delhi High Court Proposes to Frame Intellectual Property Division (IPD) Rules, 2021

11

OCT

2021

In July, 2021, the Hon’ble Chief Justice of Delhi High Court announced creation of Intellectual Property Division (IPD) to deal with IP matters including those which were to be transferred to the Delhi High Court from erstwhile Appellate Board (IPAB). On October 8, 2021, the Delhi High Court has circulated IPD Rules, 2021 for inputs from the members of the Bar. The Rules will regulate the matters listed before IPD and prescribes the practice and procedure for the exercise of the original and appellate jurisdiction of IPAD and for other miscellaneous petitions arising out of specific IP statutes. Some of the salient features of the proposed Rules are:

  1. Registered Patent agents or Trademark agents and also any professional having knowledge of the said subject matter of the dispute shall have a right of audience before the IPD, to assist the Court along with the counsels/legal practitioners representing the parties.
  2. For cases other than patent cases, the IPD pass summary judgment, without the requirement of filing a specific application seeking summary judgment on principles akin to those contained in Order XIIIA, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as applicable to commercial suits under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 22.
  3. For patent cases, summary adjudication maybe considered by the Court if the case is falling in any of the following categories.
    1. Where the remaining term of the patent is 5 years or less;
    2. A certificate of validity of the said patent has already been issued by any High Court or the Supreme Court;
    3. If the Defendant is a repeated infringer of the same or related Patent
    4. If the validity of the Patent is admitted and only infringement is denie
  4. In case of multiple proceedings relating to the same or related IPR, irrespective of whether the said proceedings are between the same parties or not, the IPD shall have the power and the discretion to direct consolidation of proceedings, hearings, and also to direct consolidated recording of evidence/ common trial and consolidated adjudication.
  5. In all matters filed before the IPD advance copy shall be served at the address for service as also through email at least 48 hours in advance, upon the Respondents including the counsels/agents, who may have represented the Respondents before the IPO, or trial court, or authority as the case may be. Upon advance copy being served, parties/counsels/agents/authority shall be represented on the first date of hearing before the Court and no further notice would be issued and the matter may be heard and disposed of on the first day of listing.

The proposed Rules, which you can access here (http://delhihighcourt.nic.in/writereaddata/Upload/PublicNotices/PublicNotice_5J4GUGI051K.PDF), aim to streamline the practice and procedure at the IPD to expedite the disposal of IP cases at the IPD and is a welcome move. We look forward to inputs for efficient working of IPD and early disposal of original cancellation actions, appeals, infringement suits and other matters related to Intellectual Property Rights.

About the Firm

LexOrbis
Address 709-710 Tolstoy House, 15-17 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi – 110001
Tel 91-11-2371 6565
Fax 91-11-2371 6556
Email manisha@lexorbis.com
Link www.lexorbis.com

Related Articles

04
OCT
2021
Suspension of Limitation Period Due to COVID-19 Withdrawn
04
OCT
2021
On September 23, 2021, the Supreme Court withdrew the suspension of limitation that was in place sin...

Read More

03
AUG
2021
Surrender of a Patent Cause and Effect
03
AUG
2021
Voluntary surrender of a patent and its revocation in a court are two distinct actions through which...

Read More

13
JUL
2021
No Grant of Anti-Suit Injunction if Foreign Proceedings Not Oppressive or Vexatious: Delhi HC
13
JUL
2021
When proceedings are pending in a foreign court against an Indian citizen, such a person can requ...

Read More

16
JUN
2021
Pre-grant Order Appealable: IPAB Precedents Lost?
16
JUN
2021
Judiciously speaking precedential value of every decision of a higher court is high for deciding ...

Read More

26
MAY
2021
Court Recognizes The Seriousness of Medicinal Trademarks
26
MAY
2021
Recently, the Delhi High Court decided the case of Mankind Pharma Limited vs Novakind Bio Sciences P...

Read More

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7